Associations between support gaps and agricultural stress.
Open accessAbstract
= 130) experiences of informational and emotional support gaps and dimensions of perceived stress related to their occupation. Gaps in informational support were positively associated with farmers' reports of general perceived stress as well as stress due to time pressures. Emotional support gaps were negatively associated with stress due to economic and climatic conditions.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
- Authors
- Holmstrom, A. J., & Shelle, G.
- Affiliations
- Michigan State University (US)
- ORCID
- Holmstrom, Amanda J.
- Venue
- Journal of Rural Mental Health
- Published
- 2025-04
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 134-141
- ISSN
- 1935-942X (ISSN-L)
- 2163-8969
- PMC
- PMC12416383
- OpenAlex
- W4405447547
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Rural Mental Health (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U54 OH 007548)
- Michigan State University Extension
- Michigan State University
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Agriculture and Farm Safety
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
- Keywords
- farmers, perceived stress, information support, emotional support, support gaps, occupational stress, time pressure, economic conditions, climatic conditions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
