Cited by 7Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumMaternal and Perinatal Health Interventions

Spiritual beliefs of mothers with potentially distressing pregnancies

Athan, Aurelie, Chung, Sara, Sawyer Cohen, Jeanette·2015·Spirituality in Clinical Practice

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/scp0000069

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Increased engagement with spiritual practices or religious faith may develop during matrescence, including transformative experiences like 'born again' events or transpersonal phenomena of indigenous traditions.

    “Spiritual. An increased engagement with spiritual practices or religious faith may develop, including transformative experiences like”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 43 · Cited by 7

Authors
Athan, A., Chung, S., & Sawyer Cohen, J.
Venue
Spirituality in Clinical Practice
Published
2015-09
Volume
2
Issue
3
Pages
216-232
ISSN
  • 2326-4500 (ISSN-L)
  • 2326-4519
OpenAlex
W2737468004
Cited by
7
References
43
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Spirituality in Clinical Practice (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Keywords
spiritual beliefs, mothers, pregnancy distress, prenatal anxiety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review