Cited by 29Healthcare Quality and ManagementPsychiatric care and mental health servicesHealthcare Policy and Management

Promoting measurement-based care and quality measure development: The APA mental and behavioral health registry initiative.

Wright, Caroline Vaile, Goodheart, Carol, Bard, David, Bobbitt, Bruce L., Butt, Zeeshan, Lysell, Kathleen, McKay, Dean, Stephens, Kari·2020·Psychological Services

Abstract

Measurement-based care has important implications across multiple avenues in mental and behavioral health care, including clinical care, quality improvement, and accountability. Using measurement-based care to demonstrate that quality care is being provided within the context of cost-efficient care could strengthen the position of mental and behavioral health providers as critical members of the health care system. Yet when measurement-based care is used to assess performance of providers, and then that performance influences reimbursement, it must be done with great care and deliberation so as not to result in unintended consequences such as punishing providers. Given psychology's expertise in measurement, the American Psychological Association (APA) and its members are uniquely suited to be leaders in promoting measurement-based care to assess quality and value. In this policy analysis paper, we examine the importance of measurement-based behavioral and mental health care across a variety of public service populations. We describe the increased federal regulatory focus on promoting quality and cost efficient care, the importance of defining and measuring quality care, and introduce an important resource being developed by APA to promote provider engagement in measurement-based care and effective participation in payment reform efforts in health care. We conclude with specific recommendations for how the field can move forward with using measurement-based care to assess acco…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/ser0000347

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The maintenance of clinical quality combined with the decreased duration of care indicates that recommended providers are likely providing effective MBC, by which clients graduate from care when adequate symptom improvement is achieved.

    “The maintenance of clinical quality combined with the decreased duration of care indicates that recommended providers are likely providing effective MBC,16 by which clients graduate from care when adequate symptom improvement is achieved.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wright, C. V., Goodheart, C., Bard, D., Bobbitt, B. L., Butt, Z., Lysell, K., McKay, D., & Stephens, K.
Affiliations
American Psychological Association (US)
Venue
Psychological Services
Published
2020-08
Volume
17
Issue
3
Pages
262-270
ISSN
  • 1541-1559 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-148X
OpenAlex
W2941020857
Cited by
29
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
FWCI
2.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Services (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Quality and Management
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
Keywords
measurement-based care, quality metrics, mental health services, behavioral health services, provider accountability, payment reform, reimbursement, quality improvement, value-based care, federal health policy
MeSH terms
Patient Reported Outcome Measures, Delivery of Health Care, Humans, Psychology, Psychometrics, Registries, Societies, Scientific, Quality Indicators, Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review