The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Psychological Maltreatment of Women Inventory
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Prior research has identified several core domains of psychological IPV: Restrictive Engulfment, Denigration, Hostile Withdrawal, and Dominance/Intimidation.
“Consistent with this multidimensionality, prior research has identified several core domains of psychological IPV, such as Restrictive Engulfment, Denigration, Hostile Withdrawal, and Dominance/Intimidation, that together capture the breadth of psychological abusive behaviors (e.g., Murphy & Hoover, 1999; Tolman, 1989).”
Widely used multidimensional psychological IPV instruments such as the MMEA and the Psychological Maltreatment of Women Inventory demonstrate strong psychometric performance, including stable factor structures and high internal consistency coefficients.
“For example, widely used multidimensional psychological IPV instruments such as the Multidimensional Measure of Emotional Abuse (MMEA) (28 items; Murphy & Hoover, 1999) and the Psychological Maltreatment of Women Inventory 58 items; Tolman, 1989) demonstrate strong psychometric performance, including stable factor structures and high internal consistency coefficients (often in the .80–.90 range).”
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A self‐report measure of legal and administrative aggression within intimate relationships
Hines, D. A., Douglas, E. M., & Berger, J. L. (2015) · Aggressive Behavior · doi:10.1002/ab.21540 · Cited by 71
Demirtaş, E. T., & Zurnacı, B. (2026) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10508-026-03422-4
Metadata
- Authors
- Tolman, R. M.
- Corresponding author
- Tolman, Richard M.
- ORCID
- Tolman, Richard M.
- Venue
- PsycTESTS Dataset
- Published
- 1989
- OpenAlex
- W4245513670
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
- Type
- dataset
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- PsycTESTS Dataset (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
- Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
- Keywords
- psychological maltreatment, women, intimate partner violence, domestic violence, psychological violence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
