The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Cyberchondria Severity Scale--Short Form
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Confirmatory bi-factor modelling indicated that the CSS-12 is best scored as a unidimensional scale.
“Confirmatory bi-factor modelling indicated that the CSS-12 is best scored as a unidimensional scale.”
From Is cyberchondria a new transdiagnostic digital compulsive syndrome? A systematic review of the evidence (2020) · cites this paper as [2]
The CSS-12 was validated in a sample of 661 undergraduates and demonstrated good psychometric properties overall, with excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.90).
“This version was validated in a sample of 661 undergraduates and demonstrated good psychometric properties overall, with excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.90).”
From Is cyberchondria a new transdiagnostic digital compulsive syndrome? A systematic review of the evidence (2020) · cites this paper as [2]
Metadata
- Authors
- McElroy, E., Kearney, M., Touhey, J., Evans, J., Cooke, Y., & Shevlin, M.
- Venue
- PsycTESTS Dataset
- Published
- 2019
- OpenAlex
- W4235335707
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- Type
- dataset
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- PsycTESTS Dataset (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
- Keywords
- cyberchondria, health anxiety, online health information, self-assessment scale, severity measurement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
