CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 111Psychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionMental Health Treatment and AccessPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Short Warwick–Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale

Stewart-Brown, Sarah, Tennant, Alan, Tennant, Ruth, Platt, Stephen, Parkinson, Jane, Weich, Scott·2021·PsycTESTS Dataset
DOI 10.1037/t80221-000
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/t80221-000

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–111 of 111

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Stewart-Brown, S., Tennant, A., Tennant, R., Platt, S., Parkinson, J., & Weich, S.
ORCID
Venue
PsycTESTS Dataset
Publisher
American Psychological Association (APA)
Published
2009
DOI
10.1037/t80221-000
OpenAlex
W3166611932
Cited by
110
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 2
Type
dataset
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
PsycTESTS Dataset (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
psychological well-being, mental health, short-form scale

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review