Culture and violence risk assessment: The case of Ewert v. Canada
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There has been an enduring concern with the validity of assessment tools with respect to Indigenous people's culture.
“There has also been an enduring concern with the validity of the assessment-tools with respect to Indigenous people's culture (Hart, 2016; Public Safety Canada, 2022b; Rugge, 2006).”
From Colonization, Normalization and Risk-Assessment: The Case of Youth Criminal Justice Act and Correctional Overrepresentation of Indigenous Youth in Canada (2025) · cites this paper as Hart, 2016
Risk assessments that determine an individual's future dangerousness or likelihood for reoffending often rely on past criminal history, and people of color may appear disproportionately risky and deserving of more correctional oversight as a result of having been previously targeted for system intervention at disproportionately high rates.
“For example, risk assessments that determine an individual ' s future dangerousness or likelihood for reoffending often rely on that individual ' s past criminal history, and people of color may appear disproportionately risky and deserving of more correctional oversight as a result of having been previously targeted for system intervention at disproportionately high rates”
From A call to dismantle systemic racism in criminal legal systems. (2022) · cites this paper as Hart, 2016
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Racist Algorithms or Systemic Problems? Risk Assessments and Racial Disparities
Vincent, G. M., & Viljoen, J. L. (2020) · Criminal Justice and Behavior · doi:10.1177/0093854820954501 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
A call to dismantle systemic racism in criminal legal systems.
Najdowski, C. J., & Stevenson, M. C. (2022) · Law and Human Behavior · doi:10.1037/lhb0000510 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Barmaki, R. (2025) · International Criminology · doi:10.1007/s43576-025-00170-8 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hart, S. D.
- Affiliations
- Simon Fraser University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Hart, Stephen D.
- ORCID
- Hart, Stephen D.
- Venue
- Journal of Threat Assessment and Management
- Published
- 2016-06
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 76-96
- ISSN
- 2169-4842 (ISSN-L)
- 2169-4850
- OpenAlex
- W2545387930
- Cited by
- 82
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 9
- FWCI
- 10.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Threat Assessment and Management (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
- Keywords
- culture and violence, risk assessment, hate speech, freedom of expression, Supreme Court of Canada
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
