Cited by 4Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsStress and Burnout ResearchPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Mindfulness, self-compassion, gratitude, and burnout in health service psychology trainees: A structural equation model.

Lyon, Allegra R., Wright, Stephen L.·2024·Training and Education in Professional Psychology

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/tep0000479

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Lyon, A. R., & Wright, S. L.
Venue
Training and Education in Professional Psychology
Published
2024-11
Volume
18
Issue
4
Pages
340-349
ISSN
  • 1931-3918 (ISSN-L)
  • 1931-3926
OpenAlex
W4396670811
Cited by
4
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3
FWCI
2.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Training and Education in Professional Psychology (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Northern Colorado
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Keywords
mindfulness, self-compassion, gratitude, burnout, health service psychology, trainee psychologists, psychological well-being

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review