Two minds are better than one: Cooperative communication as a new framework for understanding infant language learning.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Language learning occurs in social contexts constructed by the infant and the caregiver.
“Crucially, language learning occurs in social contexts constructed by the infant and the caregiver (Renzi et al., 2017).”
From The role of dyadic combinations of infants' behaviors and caregivers' verbal and multimodal responses in predicting vocabulary outcomes (2025) · cites this paper as Renzi et al., 2017
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 86 · Cited by 22
- Authors
- Renzi, D. T., Romberg, A. R., Bolger, D. J., & Newman, R. S.
- Affiliations
- University of Maryland, College Park (US)
- Venue
- Translational Issues in Psychological Science
- Published
- 2017
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 19-33
- ISSN
- 2332-2136 (ISSN-L)
- 2332-2179
- OpenAlex
- W2591933262
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 86
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 3.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Translational Issues in Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Maryland
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
- Keywords
- infant language acquisition, cooperative communication, joint attention, social interaction, language acquisition, social cognition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
