Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 50Social Work Education and PracticeResilience and Mental HealthPosttraumatic Stress Disorder Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Vicarious resilience in sexual assault and domestic violence advocates.

Frey, Lisa L., Beesley, Denise, Abbott, Deah, Kendrick, Elizabeth·2017·Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy

Abstract

Objective There is little research related to sexual assault and domestic violence advocates' experiences, with the bulk of the literature focused on stressors and systemic barriers that negatively impact efforts to assist survivors. However, advocates participating in these studies have also emphasized the positive impact they experience consequent to their work. This study explores the positive impact. Method Vicarious resilience, personal trauma experiences, peer relational quality, and perceived organizational support in advocates (n = 222) are examined. Also, overlap among the conceptual components of vicarious resilience is explored. Results The first set of multiple regressions showed that personal trauma experiences and peer relational health predicted compassion satisfaction and vicarious posttraumatic growth, with organizational support predicting only compassion satisfaction. The second set of multiple regressions showed that (a) there was significant shared variance between vicarious posttraumatic growth and compassion satisfaction; (b) after accounting for vicarious posttraumatic growth, organizational support accounted for significant variance in compassion satisfaction; and (c) after accounting for compassion satisfaction, peer relational health accounted for significant variance in vicarious posttraumatic growth. Conclusions Results suggest that it may be more meaningful to conceptualize advocates' personal growth related to their work through the lens of a mu…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/tra0000159

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Metadata

Authors
Frey, L. L., Beesley, D., Abbott, D., & Kendrick, E.
Affiliations
University of Oklahoma (US)
Venue
Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy
Published
2017-01
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
44-51
ISSN
  • 1942-9681 (ISSN-L)
  • 1942-969X
OpenAlex
W2410093582
Cited by
50
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 8
FWCI
9.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Trauma Theory Research Practice and Policy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Social Work Education and Practice
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Keywords
vicarious resilience, domestic violence advocates, vicarious posttraumatic growth, compassion satisfaction, personal trauma, organizational support, trauma-informed care
MeSH terms
Psychological Trauma, Adult, Empathy, Humans, Occupational Diseases, Patient Advocacy, Sex Offenses, Social Support, Domestic Violence, Resilience, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.