Traumatic stress in the age of COVID-19: A call to close critical gaps and adapt to new realities.
Abstract
THE ISSUE: by March of 2020. Given the rapid acceleration of transmission, and the lack of preparedness to prevent and treat this virus, the negative impacts of COVID-19 are rippling through every facet of society. Although large numbers of people throughout the world will show resilience to the profound loss, stress, and fear associated with COVID-19, the virus will likely exacerbate existing mental health disorders and contribute to the onset of new stress-related disorders for many. RECOMMENDATIONS: The field of traumatic stress should address the serious needs that will emerge now and well into the future. However, we propose that these efforts may be limited, in part, by ongoing gaps that exist within our research and clinical care. In particular, we suggest that COVID-19 requires us to prioritize and mobilize as a research and clinical community around several key areas: (a) diagnostics, (b) prevention, (c) public outreach and communication, (d) working with medical staff and mainstreaming into nonmental health services, and (e) COVID-19-specific trauma research. As members of our community begin to rapidly develop and test interventions for COVID-19-related distress, we hope that those in positions of leadership in the field of traumatic stress consider limits of our current approaches, and invest the intellectual and financial resources urgently needed in order to innovate, forge partnerships, and develop the technologies to support those in greatest need. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The pressure to respond quickly to work demands has increased as companies adopt new technologies, and the time to recover from stress has decreased.
“The pressure to respond quickly to work demands has increased as companies adopt new technologies, and the time to recover from stress has decreased [2].”
From Pilot study of an online brief mindfulness-based intervention to improve the well-being of managers and reduce their stress at work. (2024) · cites this paper as [2]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 23 · Cited by 742
- Authors
- Horesh, D., & Brown, A. D.
- Affiliations
- Bar-Ilan University (IL)
- The New School (US)
- Venue
- Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy
- Published
- 2020-05
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 331-335
- ISSN
- 1942-9681 (ISSN-L)
- 1942-969X
- OpenAlex
- W3016115444
- Cited by
- 742
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 72 · 2023: 94 · 2022: 147 · 2021: 243 · 2020: 141
- FWCI
- 62.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Trauma Theory Research Practice and Policy (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
- Keywords
- COVID-19 pandemic, traumatic stress, mental health, stress-related disorders, trauma research, injury prevention, public outreach, healthcare workers
- MeSH terms
- Psychological Trauma, Betacoronavirus, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Humans, Pneumonia, Viral, Coronavirus Infections, Pandemics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review