The DOI matches its Crossref record.
‘No Safe Place’: Applying the Transactional Stress and Coping Model to Active Warfare,”
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The mental health consequences of political violence arise within active, dynamic processes of appraisal and coping. Understanding the psychological sequela of war is an urgent task; yet, we have little on the ground exploration of the quotidian events within and the accompanying psychological responses of the totalizing experience of war. Using a transactional-based model of stress and coping, in this study, we use a novel method-retrospective diaries-to explore the shifting, unpredictable, and traumatic nature of life during a major military operation. METHOD: Our sample consisted of 21 Palestinian women recruited via an intervention for teachers in Gaza. Women's retrospective chronological diaries were analyzed using content analysis. RESULTS: Our analysis drew out the cyclical process of coping within political violence, demonstrating five essential temporal dimensions: warning; bombings, with injuries, death, and destruction; reintegrating within flight and resettlement; ongoing political insecurity within precarious truces and rampant loss and destruction; and persevering: restarting life amid pervasive trauma. CONCLUSION: Our findings draw attention to vital temporal dimensions and the cyclical nature of stress and coping that underlie the sequela of mental health in a highly charged context. In tracing warfare, its psychosocial consequences, and distinct patterns of emotional and logistical survival, our study contributes to the growing field of psychological epidemiology of war. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
It is part and parcel of a racialized modality of psychological warfare against their psyches and the future welfare of an entire generation.
“It is part and parcel of a racialized modality of psychological warfare (Sousa and Veronese 2022) against their psyches and the future welfare of an entire generation.”
From An Abolitionist Liveability Against State Carceral Unchilding Ahmad Manasra’s life-making (2024) · cites this paper as Sousa and Veronese 2022
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
An Abolitionist Liveability Against State Carceral Unchilding Ahmad Manasra’s life-making
Otman, A., & Shalhoub-Kevorkian, N. (2024) · State Crime Journal · doi:10.13169/statecrime.12.2.0245 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Sousa, C., & Veronese, G.
- Venue
- Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy
- Published
- 2022-05
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 558-567
- ISSN
- 1942-9681 (ISSN-L)
- 1942-969X
- OpenAlex
- W3137946403
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 3
- FWCI
- 1.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Trauma Theory Research Practice and Policy (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Scholarship, Research, and Creative Work at Bryn Mawr College (Bryn Mawr College) (submittedVersion)
- BOA (University of Milano-Bicocca) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Conflict Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
- Keywords
- political violence, Palestinian women, Gaza Strip, trauma, resettlement, political insecurity, women's mental health
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Female, Humans, Retrospective Studies, Violence, Warfare, Arabs
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review