Cited by 14Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchHealth and Conflict StudiesMigration, Health and Trauma

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

‘No Safe Place’: Applying the Transactional Stress and Coping Model to Active Warfare,”

Sousa, Cindy, Veronese, Guido·2022·Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The mental health consequences of political violence arise within active, dynamic processes of appraisal and coping. Understanding the psychological sequela of war is an urgent task; yet, we have little on the ground exploration of the quotidian events within and the accompanying psychological responses of the totalizing experience of war. Using a transactional-based model of stress and coping, in this study, we use a novel method-retrospective diaries-to explore the shifting, unpredictable, and traumatic nature of life during a major military operation. METHOD: Our sample consisted of 21 Palestinian women recruited via an intervention for teachers in Gaza. Women's retrospective chronological diaries were analyzed using content analysis. RESULTS: Our analysis drew out the cyclical process of coping within political violence, demonstrating five essential temporal dimensions: warning; bombings, with injuries, death, and destruction; reintegrating within flight and resettlement; ongoing political insecurity within precarious truces and rampant loss and destruction; and persevering: restarting life amid pervasive trauma. CONCLUSION: Our findings draw attention to vital temporal dimensions and the cyclical nature of stress and coping that underlie the sequela of mental health in a highly charged context. In tracing warfare, its psychosocial consequences, and distinct patterns of emotional and logistical survival, our study contributes to the growing field of psychological epidemiology of war. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/tra0001023

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It is part and parcel of a racialized modality of psychological warfare against their psyches and the future welfare of an entire generation.

    “It is part and parcel of a racialized modality of psychological warfare (Sousa and Veronese 2022) against their psyches and the future welfare of an entire generation.”

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Sousa, C., & Veronese, G.
Venue
Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy
Published
2022-05
Volume
14
Issue
4
Pages
558-567
ISSN
  • 1942-9681 (ISSN-L)
  • 1942-969X
OpenAlex
W3137946403
Cited by
14
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 3
FWCI
1.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Trauma Theory Research Practice and Policy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Scholarship, Research, and Creative Work at Bryn Mawr College (Bryn Mawr College) (submittedVersion)
  • BOA (University of Milano-Bicocca) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Conflict Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
Keywords
political violence, Palestinian women, Gaza Strip, trauma, resettlement, political insecurity, women's mental health
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Female, Humans, Retrospective Studies, Violence, Warfare, Arabs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review