Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 41Child Abuse and TraumaAttachment and Relationship DynamicsPsychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Adverse childhood experiences and insecure attachment: The indirect effects of dissociation and emotion regulation difficulties.

Snyder, Kaitlin S., Luchner, Andrew F., Tantleff-Dunn, Stacey·2024·Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy

Abstract

Objective Difficulties with dissociation and emotion regulation are well-documented reactions to early adverse childhood experiences (ACEs). Although findings identify dissociation and emotion dysregulation as explaining the relationship between various forms of ACEs and adult psychopathology, less is known about their combined effect in the relationship between ACEs and insecure attachment in adulthood. This study examined the indirect effects of dissociation and emotion regulation difficulties in the relationship between early adverse experiences and insecure attachment traits. Method Participants ( N = 260) completed an online questionnaire measuring ACEs, dissociation, emotion regulation difficulties, and anxious and avoidant attachment. Results Results indicated that, after controlling for mental health treatment, dissociation and emotion regulation difficulties explained the relationship between ACEs and insecure (anxious and avoidant) attachment. Emotion regulation difficulties were not a significant predictor of avoidant attachment. Conclusion Findings provide support for greater research on mediating factors in the maintenance of insecure attachment across development and potential implications of dissociation and emotion regulation in clinical and nonclinical populations. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/tra0001532

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Snyder, K. S., Luchner, A. F., & Tantleff-Dunn, S.
Affiliations
Rollins College (US)
Venue
Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy
Published
2024-04
Volume
16
Issue
Suppl 1
Pages
S20-S27
ISSN
  • 1942-9681 (ISSN-L)
  • 1942-969X
OpenAlex
W4380357024
Cited by
41
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 6
FWCI
11.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Trauma Theory Research Practice and Policy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Keywords
adverse childhood experiences, insecure attachment, dissociation, emotional dysregulation, attachment anxiety, attachment avoidance, mediation, early childhood trauma, adult attachment
MeSH terms
Adverse Childhood Experiences, Emotional Regulation, Adolescent, Adult, Dissociative Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Object Attachment, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.