Cited by 158Neuroscience and Music PerceptionDiverse Music Education InsightsCognitive Abilities and Testing

Musical ability, music training, and language ability in childhood.

Swaminathan, Swathi, Schellenberg, E. Glenn·2020·Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition

Abstract

We tested theories of links between musical expertise and language ability in a sample of 6- to 9-year-old children. Language ability was measured with tests of speech perception and grammar. Musical expertise was measured with a test of musical ability that had 3 subtests (melody discrimination, rhythm discrimination, and long-term memory for music) and as duration of music training. Covariates included measures of demographics, general cognitive ability (IQ, working memory), and personality (openness-to-experience). Music training was associated positively with performance on the grammar test, musical ability, IQ, openness, and age. Musical ability predicted performance on the tests of speech perception and grammar, as well as IQ, working memory, openness, and age. Regression analyses-with other variables held constant-revealed that language abilities had significant partial associations with musical ability and IQ but not with music training. Rhythm discrimination was a better predictor of language skills compared with melody discrimination, but memory for music was equally good. Bayesian analyses confirmed the results from the standard analyses. The implications of the findings are threefold: (a) musical ability predicts language ability, and the association is independent of IQ and other confounding variables; (b) links between music and language appear to arise primarily from preexisting factors and not from formal training in music; and (c) evidence for a special link…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/xlm0000798

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Swaminathan, S., & Schellenberg, E. G.
Venue
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
Published
2020-12
Volume
46
Issue
12
Pages
2340-2348
ISSN
  • 0278-7393 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1285
OpenAlex
W2989630423
Cited by
158
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 5
FWCI
9.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Music › Diverse Music Education Insights
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
musical ability, musical training, language skills, rhythm discrimination, melody discrimination, music memory, IQ, working memory, openness to experience, child development
MeSH terms
Aptitude, Bayes Theorem, Child, Female, Humans, Language, Language Development, Male, Music, Speech Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review