The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Mechanism of Mendelian Heredity
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In 1915 Morgan, with three colleagues, published The Mechanism of Mendelian Heredity, probably the most important book in the history of genetics.
“In 1915 this led him to publish, with three other colleagues, all of whom became major geneticists, what is probably the most important book in the entire history of genetics, The Mechanism of Mendelian Heredity [7].”
From From Mendel to epigenetics: History of genetics (2016) · cites this paper as [7]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mendelian randomization: Using genes as instruments for making causal inferences in epidemiology
Lawlor, D. A., Harbord, R. M., Sterne, J. A. C., Timpson, N., & Davey Smith, G. (2008) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.3034 · Cited by 4,618
The origin and evolution of cell types
Arendt, D., Musser, J. M., Baker, C. V. H., Bergman, A., Cepko, C., Erwin, D. H., Pavlicev, M., Schlosser, G., Widder, S., Laubichler, M. D., et al. (2016) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg.2016.127 · Cited by 764
From Mendel to epigenetics: History of genetics
Gayon, J. (2016) · Comptes Rendus. Biologies · doi:10.1016/j.crvi.2016.05.009 · Cited by 160
Dominant versus recessive: Molecular mechanisms in metabolic disease
Zschocke, J. (2008) · Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease · doi:10.1007/s10545-008-1016-5 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 1916-04
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 2423
- Pages
- 117-118
- ISSN
- 0028-0836
- 1476-4687
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
