Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,574

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Luttinger-liquid behaviour in carbon nanotubes

Open access
Bockrath, Marc, Cobden, David H., Lu, Jia, Rinzler, Andrew G., Smalley, Richard E., Balents, Leon, McEuen, Paul L.·1999·Nature

Abstract

Electron transport in conductors is usually well described by Fermi-liquid theory, which assumes that the energy states of the electrons near the Fermi level EF are not qualitatively altered by Coulomb interactions. In one-dimensional systems, however, even weak Coulomb interactions cause strong perturbations. The resulting system, known as a Luttinger liquid, is predicted to be distinctly different from its two- and three-dimensional counterparts. For example, tunnelling into a Luttinger liquid at energies near the Fermi level is predicted to be strongly suppressed, unlike in two- and three-dimensional metals. Experiments on one-dimensional semiconductor wires, have been interpreted by using Luttinger-liquid theory, but an unequivocal verification of the theoretical predictions has not yet been obtained. Similarly, the edge excitations seen in fractional quantum Hall conductors are consistent with Luttinger-liquid behaviour, , but recent experiments failed to confirm the predicted relationship between the electrical properties of the bulk state and those of the edge states. Electrically conducting single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs) represent quantum wires that may exhibit Luttinger-liquid behaviour, . Here we present measurements of the conductance of bundles (‘ropes’) of SWNTs as a function of temperature and voltage that agree with predictions for tunnelling into a Luttinger liquid. In particular, we find that the conductance and differential conductance scale as power laws with respect to temperature and bias voltage, respectively, and that the functional forms and the exponents are in good agreement with theoretical predictions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/17569

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 1,574

Metadata

Authors
Bockrath, M., Cobden, D. H., Lu, J., Rinzler, A. G., Smalley, R. E., Balents, L., & McEuen, P. L.
Venue
Nature
Published
1999-02
Volume
397
Issue
6720
Pages
598-601
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W1485771830
Cited by
1,574
References
1
FWCI
50.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Luttinger-liquid behaviour in carbon nanotubes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/17569
The paper
Bockrath, M., Cobden, D. H., Lu, J., Rinzler, A. G., Smalley, R. E., Balents, L., & McEuen, P. L. (1999). Luttinger-liquid behaviour in carbon nanotubes. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/17569

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.