The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Rapid accumulation and turnover of soil carbon in a re-establishing forest
Open accessAbstract
Present understanding of the global carbon cycle is limited by uncertainty over soil-carbon dynamics,,,,,. The clearing of the world's forests, mainly for agricultural uses, releases large amounts of carbon to the atmosphere (up to 2× 1015 g yr−1), much of which arises from the cultivation driving an accelerated decomposition of soil organic matter,,,. Although the effects of cultivation on soil carbon are well studied, studies of soil-carbon recovery after cultivation are limited,,,,,,,. Here we present a four-decade-long field study of carbon accumulation by pine ecosystems established on previously cultivated soils in South Carolina, USA. Newly accumulated carbon is tracked by its distinctive 14C signature, acquired around the onset of forest growth from thermonuclear bomb testing that nearly doubled atmospheric 14CO2 in the 1960s. Field data combined with model simulations indicate that the young aggrading forest rapidly incorporated bomb radiocarbon into the forest floor and the upper 60 cm of underlying mineral soil. By the 1990s, however, carbon accumulated only in forest biomass, forest floor, and the upper 7.5 cm of the mineral soil. Although the forest was a strong carbon sink, trees accounted for about 80%, the forest floor 20%, and mineral soil <1%, of the carbon accretion. Despite high carbon inputs to the mineral soil, carbon sequestration was limited by rapid decomposition, facilitated by the coarse soil texture and low-activity clay mineralogy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bio-char Sequestration in Terrestrial Ecosystems – A Review
Lehmann, J., Gaunt, J., & Rondon, M. (2006) · Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change · doi:10.1007/s11027-005-9006-5 · Cited by 3,053
Soil carbon sequestration and land‐use change: processes and potential
Post, W. M., & Kwon, K. C. (2000) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2486.2000.00308.x · Cited by 2,602
How strongly can forest management influence soil carbon sequestration?
Jandl, R., Lindner, M., Vesterdal, L., Bauwens, B., Baritz, R., Hagedorn, F., Johnson, D. W., Minkkinen, K., & Byrne, K. A. (2007) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2006.09.003 · Cited by 1,458
Change in soil carbon following afforestation
Paul, K. I., Polglase, P. J., Nyakuengama, J. G., & Khanna, P. K. (2002) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-1127(01)00740-x · Cited by 1,091
Carbon accumulation in agricultural soils after afforestation: a meta-analysis
LAGANIÈRE, J., ANGERS, D. A., & PARÉ, D. (2010) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01930.x · Cited by 956
Metadata
- Authors
- Richter, D. D., Markewitz, D., Trumbore, S. E., & Wells, C. G.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 1999-07
- Volume
- 400
- Issue
- 6739
- Pages
- 56-58
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W1876752304
- Cited by
- 638
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 30.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rapid accumulation and turnover of soil carbon in a re-establishing forest. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/21867
- The paper
- Richter, D. D., Markewitz, D., Trumbore, S. E., & Wells, C. G. (1999). Rapid accumulation and turnover of soil carbon in a re-establishing forest. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/21867
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.