Rb–Sr ages of early Archaean supracrustal rocks and Amîtsoq gneisses at Isua
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
These regions are dominated by tonalite-trondhjemite-granodiorite (TTG) granitoids and mafic-to-ultramafic volcanic rocks, with rare supracrustal rocks.
“These regions are dominated by tonalite-trondhjemite-granodiorite (TTG) granitoids (Jahn et al., 1981;Moyen and Martin, 2012;White et al., 2017) and mafic-to-ultramafic volcanic rocks (Nisbet et al., 1977;Wilson et al., 1978;Xie et al., 1993), with rare supracrustal rocks (Moorbath et al., 1977;Boak and Dymek, 1982;Jackson et al., 1994).”
From Secular change and the onset of plate tectonics on Earth (2020) · cites this paper as Moorbath et al., 1977
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 10 · Cited by 93
- Authors
- MOORBATH, S., ALLAART, J. H., BRIDGWATER, D., & MCGREGOR, V. R.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland (DK)
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 1977-11
- Volume
- 270
- Issue
- 5632
- Pages
- 43-45
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2044590283
- Cited by
- 93
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 3.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geological and Geochemical Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
- Keywords
- Rb-Sr geochronology, Isua supracrustal belt, early Archaean, Isua, Godthaab, Precambrian crustal evolution, age relationships
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review