A silicon-based nuclear spin quantum computer
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
For open-ended chains with N from 2 to 80, the maximum fidelity of quantum state transfer over t0 in [0,4000/J] exceeds the classical fidelity threshold 2/3 for N=80.
“The plot also shows that a chain of N as high as 80 exceeds the highest fidelity for classical transmission of the state i.e., 2 / 3 [12] in the time interval probed by us.”
From Quantum Communication through an Unmodulated Spin Chain (2003) · cites this paper as [12]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 35 · Cited by 3,779
- Authors
- Kane, B. E.
- Affiliations
- UNSW Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Kane, B. E.
- ORCID
- Kane, B. E.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 1998-05
- Volume
- 393
- Issue
- 6681
- Pages
- 133-137
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W1509182036
- Cited by
- 3,779
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2026: 43 · 2025: 81 · 2024: 83 · 2023: 156 · 2022: 120 · 2021: 108 · 2020: 117 · 2019: 112 · 2018: 115 · 2017: 105 · 2016: 125 · 2015: 124 · 2014: 107 · 2013: 138 · 2012: 116
- FWCI
- 69.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum and electron transport phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Keywords
- quantum computing, nuclear spin qubits, silicon quantum devices, donor atoms, electric field control of spin, spin measurement, quantum gates, doped silicon
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
