Cited by 772Protist diversity and phylogenyPhotosynthetic Processes and MechanismsPlant Diversity and Evolution

Gene transfer to the nucleus and the evolution of chloroplasts

Martin, William, Stoebe, Bettina, Goremykin, Vadim, Hansmann, Sabine, Hasegawa, Masami, Kowallik, Klaus V.·1998·Nature

Abstract

Photosynthetic eukaryotes, particularly unicellular forms, possess a fossil record that is either wrought with gaps or difficult to interpret, or both. Attempts to reconstruct their evolution have focused on plastid phylogeny, but were limited by the amount and type of phylogenetic information contained within single genes. Among the 210 different protein-coding genes contained in the completely sequenced chloroplast genomes from a glaucocystophyte, a rhodophyte, a diatom, a euglenophyte and five land plants, we have now identified the set of 45 common to each and to a cyanobacterial outgroup genome. Phylogenetic inference with an alignment of 11,039 amino-acid positions per genome indicates that this information is sufficient--but just rarely so--to identify the rooted nine-taxon topology. We mapped the process of gene loss from chloroplast genomes across the inferred tree and found that, surprisingly, independent parallel gene losses in multiple lineages outnumber phylogenetically unique losses by more that 4:1. We identified homologues of 44 different plastid-encoded proteins as functional nuclear genes of chloroplast origin, providing evidence for endosymbiotic gene transfer to the nucleus in plants.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/30234

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 32 · Cited by 772

Authors
Martin, W., Stoebe, B., Goremykin, V., Hansmann, S., Hasegawa, M., & Kowallik, K. V.
Affiliations
  • Technische Universität Braunschweig (DE)
  • Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE)
  • The Institute of Statistical Mathematics (JP)
Corresponding author
Martin, William
Venue
Nature
Published
1998-05
Volume
393
Issue
6681
Pages
162-165
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W1579785391
Cited by
772
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 17
FWCI
15.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protist diversity and phylogeny
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Plant Diversity and Evolution
Keywords
chloroplast evolution, endosymbiotic gene transfer, plastid phylogeny, chloroplast genome, gene loss, photosynthetic eukaryotes, land plants, diatoms, Euglenophyta, red algae
MeSH terms
Cell Nucleus, Chloroplasts, Phylogeny, Plant Proteins, Plants, Symbiosis, Genes, Plant, Evolution, Molecular, Gene Transfer, Horizontal, Plant Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review