Cited by 20Evolutionary Game Theory and CooperationExperimental Behavioral Economics StudiesEvolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior

Help and you shall be helped

Ferrière, Régis·1998·Nature

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/31102

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a population of discriminators, unconditional cooperators can increase by random drift and eventually invite the invasion of defectors.

    “In a population of discriminators, unconditional cooperators can increase by random drift and eventually invite the invasion of defectors.”

    From Evolution of indirect reciprocity (2005) · cites this paper as [38]

  • The cooperative outcome in the indirect reciprocity model lacks stability.

    “The second issue concerns the lack of stability of the cooperative outcome.”

    From Evolution of indirect reciprocity (2005) · cites this paper as [38]

  • The simulations display occasional bursts of defection, which are based on a previous build-up of undiscriminating altruists.

    “The simulations display occasional bursts of defection, which are based on a previous build-up of undiscriminating altruists.”

    From Evolution of indirect reciprocity (2005) · cites this paper as [38]

  • If such a consensual assessment can be achieved, the corresponding strategy is robust.

    “If such a consensual assessment can be achieved, the corresponding strategy is robust 38,39,41 .”

    From Evolution of indirect reciprocity (2005) · cites this paper as [38]

  • A more sophisticated assessment rule should distinguish between justified and unjustified defection, taking into account the score of the receiver.

    “A more sophisticated assessment rule should distinguish between justified and unjustified defection, and thus take into account the score of the receiver: someone withholding help from a 'bad' player should not pay with a reduced score 35,38,39,47 .”

    From Evolution of indirect reciprocity (2005) · cites this paper as [38]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 3 · Cited by 20

Authors
Ferrière, R.
Affiliations
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Ferrière, Régis
Venue
Nature
Published
1998-06
Volume
393
Issue
6685
Pages
517-519
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W1965441517
Cited by
20
References
3
Citations by year
2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • IIASA PURE (International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Keywords
moral development, cooperation, one-shot interactions, reputation, repeated games, social behavior, evolutionary game theory
MeSH terms
Animals, Cooperative Behavior, Biological Evolution, Game Theory, Helping Behavior, Humans, Models, Biological, Morals, Selection, Genetic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review