Cited by 184RNA Research and SplicingCancer-related molecular mechanisms researchGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics

A mouse locus at which transcription from both DNA strands produces mRNAs complementary at their 3′ ends

Williams, Trevor, Fried, Mike·1986·Nature

Abstract

The organization and large size of the mammalian cell genome allows spatial separation of different transcription units. In those cases where more than one species of messenger are synthesized from the same cellular DNA sequence, they have been found to be generated from transcription proceeding in the same direction. These mRNAs always share regions of homology and can differ from one another as a result of differential processing (splicing and/or polyadenylation) or alternative initiation. In contrast, complementary mRNAs transcribed from opposite strands of the same cellular DNA sequence have not previously been observed. Here we have identified a region of mouse DNA at which processed mRNAs from two adjacent convergent transcription units overlap by 133 base pairs (bp) at their 3'-untranslated ends. One of the transcription units appears to encode a second mRNA which does not contain this overlapping region. This represents the first description of the natural occurrence of processed mammalian cell mRNAs transcribed from opposite strands of the same DNA sequence. The implications of these complementary regions in normal gene regulation are discussed in the context of the finding that the artificial introduction into cells of DNA constructs synthesizing anti-sense RNAs complementary to regions of mRNA transcribed from a chromosomal gene, can inhibit the gene's activity, presumably by the formation of double-stranded RNA.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/322275a0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • NATs have become significant regulators of gene expression.

    “Once considered transcriptional noise, also similar to all of the non-coding RNAs, as the case of NATs’ weight of evidence has fast evolved throughout the years, they have become a significant regulator of gene expression.”
  • NATs are capable of being active in all stages of the transfer of information in the central dogma for transcription, translation, replication, and RNA degradation.

    “NATs are capable of being active in all stages of the transfer of information in the central dogma for transcription, translation, replication, sometimes conventionally named differently, and also RNA degradation.”
  • NATs display conservation across the kingdoms of life and are involved in transcription or in ncRNA genesis.

    “They display conservation all across the kingdoms of life, being involved in transcription or in ncRNA genesis.”
  • NATs can contribute to gene expression switching transcription and can act within protein complexes as a modular scaffold; in both functions they can rewire expression machinery.

    “Either way, it could contribute to gene expression switching transcription, and also, it can act within protein/complexes as a modular scaffold; in both functions, it can rewire expression machinery [63].”
  • NATs' genomic structure enables regulation of their expression in cis, and they could also regulate expression in transposition depending on domain size.

    “Their genomic structure enables the regulation of their expression in cis, but could also regulate expression in transposition, although it depends on how large the domain is.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 50 · Cited by 184

Authors
Williams, T., & Fried, M.
Venue
Nature
Published
1986-07
Volume
322
Issue
6076
Pages
275-279
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2043981870
Cited by
184
References
50
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
6.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Keywords
convergent transcription, antisense mRNA, gene expression regulation, antisense RNA, double-stranded RNA, polyadenylation, splicing, differential processing
MeSH terms
Animals, Base Composition, DNA, Gene Expression Regulation, Genes, Regulator, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Nucleic Acid Conformation, Poly A, RNA, Double-Stranded, RNA, Messenger, Sequence Homology, Nucleic Acid, Transcription, Genetic, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review