Cited by 62Cognitive Abilities and TestingIntergenerational and Educational Inequality StudiesEducational Outcomes and Influences

National secular trends in intelligence and education: a twenty-year cross-sectional study

Teasdale, T. W., Owen, David R.·1987·Nature

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/325119a0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The estimated curvilinear development in mean intelligence test scores of Danish male birth cohorts born between 1940 and 2000 is supported by previous Danish studies based on somewhat selected samples and partly by a global meta-analysis reporting decreasing intelligence test score gains in more recent decades.

    “The estimated curvilinear development in mean intelligence test scores of the Danish male birth cohorts born between 1940 and 2000 is supported by previous Danish studies based on somewhat selected samples of our study population and also partly by a global meta-analysis of studies covering an entire century reporting decreasing intelligence test score gains in more recent decades [4, 9–14].”
  • Previous Danish studies based on young male conscripts suggested that intelligence test scores increased with a decelerating rate between 1959 and 1998 (birth cohorts 1940-1979), since then a slight fall and subsequent stagnation have been observed.

    “Previous Danish studies based on young male conscripts have suggested that intelligence test scores have increased with a decelerating rate between 1959 and 1998 (i.e. between the birth cohorts of 1940 and 1979), since then a slight fall and a subsequent stagnation have been observed [9–14].”
  • Danish studies have suggested that the observed secular trend of intelligence test scores has mirrored the country's educational changes.

    “Danish studies have suggested that the observed secular trend of intelligence test scores has mirrored the country’s educational changes [10–12].”
  • It has been shown that the secular increase was strongest among those with low intelligence test scores and that this coincided with an increase in the population's minimum educational level and increasing resources allocated to remedial and supplementary education.

    “Thus, it has been shown that the secular increase was strongest among those with low intelligence test scores and that this coincided with an increase in the population’s minimum educational level and increasing resources being allocated to remedial and supplementary education.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Teasdale, T. W., & Owen, D. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • Brooklyn College (US)
Venue
Nature
Published
1987-01
Volume
325
Issue
6100
Pages
119-121
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2057259486
Cited by
62
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Nature (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Outcomes and Influences
Keywords
intelligence trends, IQ change, secular trends, educational attainment, cross-sectional study

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review