The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A computational theory for the perception of coherent visual motion
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Object perception as Bayesian inference
Kersten, D., Mamassian, P., & Yuille, A. (2004) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142005 · Cited by 1,269
Self-citationMotion: The long and short of it
Mather, G., & Cavanagh, P. (1989) · Spatial Vision · doi:10.1163/156856889x00077 · Cited by 621
Robust Point Matching via Vector Field Consensus
Ma, J., Zhao, J., Tian, J., Yuille, A. L., & Tu, Z. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2014.2307478 · Cited by 566
Self-citationNon-Rigid Point Set Registration by Preserving Global and Local Structures
Ma, J., Zhao, J., & Yuille, A. L. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2015.2467217 · Cited by 334
Self-citationA parallel algorithm for real-time computation of optical flow
Bülthoff, H., Little, J., & Poggio, T. (1989) · Nature · doi:10.1038/337549a0 · Cited by 158
Metadata
- Authors
- Yuille, A. L., & Grzywacz, N. M.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 1988-05-05
- Volume
- 333
- Issue
- 6168
- Pages
- 71-74
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W1974170286
- Cited by
- 210
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A computational theory for the perception of coherent visual motion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/333071a0
- The paper
- Yuille, A. L., & Grzywacz, N. M. (1988). A computational theory for the perception of coherent visual motion. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/333071a0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
