Attention modulates synchronized neuronal firing in primate somatosensory cortex
Abstract
A potentially powerful information processing strategy in the brain is to take advantage of the temporal structure of neuronal spike trains. An increase in synchrony within the neural representation of an object or location increases the efficacy of that neural representation at the next synaptic stage in the brain; thus, increasing synchrony is a candidate for the neural correlate of attentional selection. We investigated the synchronous firing of pairs of neurons in the secondary somatosensory cortex (SII) of three monkeys trained to switch attention between a visual task and a tactile discrimination task. We found that most neuron pairs in SII cortex fired synchronously and, furthermore, that the degree of synchrony was affected by the monkey's attentional state. In the monkey performing the most difficult task, 35% of neuron pairs that fired synchronously changed their degree of synchrony when the monkey switched attention between the tactile and visual tasks. Synchrony increased in 80% and decreased in 20% of neuron pairs affected by attention.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Synchronization of firing across the cortical column is commonly observed during decision-making and is attributed to top-down feedback regulation.
“Such synchronization of firing across the cortical column is commonly observed (32) during decision-making that is attributed to top–down feedback regulation (33, 34) that influences experience-derived predictions (10), establishment of attentional state (35) and working memory (36).”
From Neural correlates of perceptual decision-making in the primary somatosensory cortex (2026) · cites this paper as [32]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 29 · Cited by 725
- Authors
- Steinmetz, P. N., Roy, A., Fitzgerald, P. J., Hsiao, S. S., Johnson, K. O., & Niebur, E.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Niebur, E.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2000-03
- Volume
- 404
- Issue
- 6774
- Pages
- 187-190
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2073512103
- Cited by
- 725
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 29
- FWCI
- 22.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Keywords
- attention, neuronal synchronization, secondary somatosensory cortex, spike train synchrony, selective attention, tactile discrimination, visual attention, neural correlates of attention
- MeSH terms
- Action Potentials, Animals, Attention, Cortical Synchronization, Macaca mulatta, Male, Neurons, Somatosensory Cortex, Touch, Visual Perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review