Is Heterosynaptic modulation essential for stabilizing hebbian plasiticity and memory
Abstract
In 1894, Ramón y Cajal first proposed that memory is stored as an anatomical change in the strength of neuronal connections. For the following 60 years, little evidence was recruited in support of this idea. This situation changed in the middle of the twentieth century with the development of cellular techniques for the study of synaptic connections and the emergence of new formulations of synaptic plasticity that redefined Ramón y Cajal's idea, making it more suitable for testing. These formulations defined two categories of plasticity, referred to as homosynaptic or Hebbian activity-dependent, and heterosynaptic or modulatory input-dependent. Here we suggest that Hebbian mechanisms are used primarily for learning and for short-term memory but often cannot, by themselves, recruit the events required to maintain a long-term memory. In contrast, heterosynaptic plasticity commonly recruits long-term memory mechanisms that lead to transcription and to synpatic growth. When jointly recruited, homosynaptic mechanisms assure that learning is effectively established and heterosynaptic mechanisms ensure that memory is maintained.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Coactivation of noradrenergic β receptors and subsequent G protein-coupled signaling pathways in conjunction with depolarization of LA neurons cooperatively regulates LA plasticity and fear conditioning.
“In fact it has been suggested that coactivation of noradrenergic β receptors and subsequent G protein-coupled signaling pathways in conjunction with depolarization of LA neurons cooperatively regulates LA plasticity and fear conditioning (50).”
From Optical activation of lateral amygdala pyramidal cells instructs associative fear learning (2010) · cites this paper as [50]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 135 · Cited by 382
- Authors
- Bailey, C. H., Giustetto, M., Huang, Y.-Y., Hawkins, R. D., & Kandel, E. R.
- Affiliations
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
- Venue
- Nature Reviews Neuroscience
- Published
- 2000-10
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 11-20
- ISSN
- 1471-003X (ISSN-L)
- 1471-0048
- OpenAlex
- W1501143146
- Cited by
- 382
- References
- 135
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 1.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature reviews. Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Keywords
- heterosynaptic plasticity, homosynaptic plasticity, Hebbian plasticity, synaptic plasticity, memory consolidation, long-term memory, short-term memory, learning, transcription, synaptic growth, memory storage
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Aplysia, Conditioning, Classical, Hippocampus, Humans, Memory, Synaptic Transmission, Neuronal Plasticity, Long-Term Potentiation, Neurotransmitter Agents
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review