Cited by 314Animal Vocal Communication and BehaviorNeuroscience and Music PerceptionPhonetics and Phonology Research

Auditory feedback in learning and maintenance of vocal behaviour

Brainard, Michael S., Doupe, Allison J.·2000·Nature Reviews Neuroscience

Abstract

Songbirds are one of the best-studied examples of vocal learners. Learning of both human speech and birdsong depends on hearing. Once learned, adult song in many species remains unchanging, suggesting a reduced influence of sensory experience. Recent studies have revealed, however, that adult song is not always stable, extending our understanding of the mechanisms involved in song maintenance, and their similarity to those active during song learning. Here we review some of the processes that contribute to song learning and production, with an emphasis on the role of auditory feedback. We then consider some of the possible neural substrates involved in these processes, particularly basal ganglia circuitry. Although a thorough treatment of human speech is beyond the scope of this article, we point out similarities between speech and song learning, and ways in which studies of these disparate behaviours complement each other in developing an understanding of general principles that contribute to learning and maintenance of vocal behaviour.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/35036205

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The bird is thought to fine-tune its song during the second phase by comparing auditory feedback of its own vocalizations with copies of tutors' songs that are stored in memory.

    “The bird is thought to fine-tune its song during this phase by comparing auditory feedback of its own vocalizations with copies of tutors’ songs that are stored in memory.”

    From Corollary discharge across the animal kingdom (2008) · cites this paper as [68]

  • Corollary discharge seems to have a key role during the second phase of vocal learning.

    “CD seems to have a key role during the second phase of vocal learning68,69.”

    From Corollary discharge across the animal kingdom (2008) · cites this paper as [68]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 110 · Cited by 314

Authors
Brainard, M. S., & Doupe, A. J.
Affiliations
University of California, San Francisco (US)
Venue
Nature Reviews Neuroscience
Published
2000-10
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
31-40
ISSN
  • 1471-003X (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-0048
OpenAlex
W1542750461
Cited by
314
References
110
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 14
FWCI
1.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature reviews. Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Burroughs Wellcome Fund
  • John Merck Fund
  • Life Sciences Research Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
Keywords
auditory feedback, vocal learning, songbirds, bird song, basal ganglia, phonation, speech learning
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Animals, Auditory Pathways, Basal Ganglia, Behavior, Animal, Feedback, Humans, Learning, Speech, Vocalization, Animal, Prosencephalon, Songbirds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review