Isotopic evidence for microbial sulphate reduction in the early Archaean era
Abstract
Sulphate-reducing microbes affect the modern sulphur cycle, and may be quite ancient, though when they evolved is uncertain. These organisms produce sulphide while oxidizing organic matter or hydrogen with sulphate. At sulphate concentrations greater than 1 mM, the sulphides are isotopically fractionated (depleted in 34S) by 10-40/1000 compared to the sulphate, with fractionations decreasing to near 0/1000 at lower concentrations. The isotope record of sedimentary sulphides shows large fractionations relative to seawater sulphate by 2.7 Gyr ago, indicating microbial sulphate reduction. In older rocks, however, much smaller fractionations are of equivocal origin, possibly biogenic but also possibly volcanogenic. Here we report microscopic sulphides in approximately 3.47-Gyr-old barites from North Pole, Australia, with maximum fractionations of 21.1/1000, about a mean of 11.6/1000, clearly indicating microbial sulphate reduction. Our results extend the geological record of microbial sulphate reduction back more than 750 million years, and represent direct evidence of an early specific metabolic pathway--allowing time calibration of a deep node on the tree of life.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Geochemical isotope evidence attests to the existence of processes performed by sulfate reducers-sulfate/sulfite reduction and sulfur disproportionation-in the early Archaean era, around 3.4 billion years ago.
“It is furthermore supported by geochemical isotope evidence that attests to the existence of processes performed by sulfate reducers—sulfate/sulfite reduction and sulfur disproportionation—in the early Archaean era, around 3.4 billion years ago [173–175].”
From Early bioenergetic evolution (2013) · cites this paper as [173]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 35 · Cited by 620
- Authors
- Shen, Y., Buick, R., & Canfield, D. E.
- Affiliations
- University of Southern Denmark (DK)
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Shen, Yanan
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2001-03
- Volume
- 410
- Issue
- 6824
- Pages
- 77-81
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W1538607061
- Cited by
- 620
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 29
- FWCI
- 25.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Origins and Evolution of Life
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geological and Geochemical Analysis
- Keywords
- microbial sulfate reduction, early Archaean, origin of life, tree of life, microbial evolution
- MeSH terms
- Archaea, Arctic Regions, Australia, Bacteria, Phylogeny, RNA, Ribosomal, Soil Microbiology, Sulfates, Time, Sulfur-Reducing Bacteria, Geologic Sediments
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review