Dinosaurian growth patterns and rapid avian growth rates
Abstract
Did dinosaurs grow in a manner similar to extant reptiles, mammals or birds, or were they unique? Are rapid avian growth rates an innovation unique to birds, or were they inherited from dinosaurian precursors? We quantified growth rates for a group of dinosaurs spanning the phylogenetic and size diversity for the clade and used regression analysis to characterize the results. Here we show that dinosaurs exhibited sigmoidal growth curves similar to those of other vertebrates, but had unique growth rates with respect to body mass. All dinosaurs grew at accelerated rates relative to the primitive condition seen in extant reptiles. Small dinosaurs grew at moderately rapid rates, similar to those of marsupials, but large species attained rates comparable to those of eutherian mammals and precocial birds. Growth in giant sauropods was similar to that of whales of comparable size. Non-avian dinosaurs did not attain rates like those of altricial birds. Avian growth rates were attained in a stepwise fashion after birds diverged from theropod ancestors in the Jurassic period.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Whole body maximal growth rates for non-avialan dinosaurs are within the range expected for endotherms.
“Erickson and colleagues [31], [44], [45] have shown that whole body maximal growth rates for non-avialan dinosaurs are within the range expected for endotherms.”
From Was Dinosaurian Physiology Inherited by Birds? Reconciling Slow Growth in Archaeopteryx (2009) · cites this paper as [45]
Many birds feed offspring half-digested food, and crop 'milk' in pigeons, flamingoes and some penguins is well-known; it has been proposed that only something similar can explain extremely high growth rates in sauropod dinosaurs.
“Many birds feed offspring half-digested food, and crop 'milk' in pigeons, flamingoes and some penguins is a well-known phenomenon (Eraud et al., 2008), and it has been proposed that only something similar can explain extremely high growth rates in sauropod dinosaurs (Erickson et al., 2001).”
From The evolution of sociality and the polyvagal theory (2023) · cites this paper as Erickson et al., 2001
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 25 · Cited by 252
- Authors
- Erickson, G. M., Rogers, K. C., & Yerby, S. A.
- Affiliations
- Florida State University (US)
- Science Museum of Minnesota (US)
- Stanford University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Erickson, Gregory M.
- ORCID
- Erickson, Gregory M.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2001-07-26
- Volume
- 412
- Issue
- 6845
- Pages
- 429-433
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2022084472
- Cited by
- 252
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 17
- FWCI
- 7.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2015-12-16)
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
- Keywords
- growth curves, body mass, sauropod dinosaurs, theropod dinosaurs, birds, evolutionary innovation, altriciality, precociality, marsupials, placental mammals, whales
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Birds, Biological Evolution, Reptiles
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review