The relationship between abundance and body size in British birds
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Nee et al. (1991) found that in British birds the direction of correlation between body size and abundance flipped back and forth depending on how the data were aggregated.
“This is precisely what Nee et al. (1991) found looking at the relationship between body size and abundance in British birds; depending on how they aggregated the data (means of species, means of genera, means of tribes, etc.) the direction of correlation flipped back and forth.”
From Rethinking phylogenetic comparative methods (2018) · cites this paper as Nee et al. (1991)
Cites
Population Density and Body Size in Birds
Juanes, F. (1986) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/284613 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The biomass distribution on Earth
Bar-On, Y. M., Phillips, R., & Milo, R. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1711842115 · Cited by 3,723 · see citing works
“(181), we calculate the average bird wet weight of British birds to be ≈80 g per bird.”
BackgroundMethodRethinking phylogenetic comparative methods
Uyeda, J. C., Zenil-Ferguson, R., & Pennell, M. W. (2018) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/syy031 · Cited by 313 · see citing works
- Authors
- Nee, S., Read, A. F., Greenwood, J. J. D., & Harvey, P. H.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 1991-05
- Volume
- 351
- Issue
- 6324
- Pages
- 312-313
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W1977103745
- Cited by
- 320
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 19.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
- Keywords
- body weight, British birds, phylogenetic relatedness, population size estimation, allometry, species abundance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review