Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 767

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Possible gravitational microlensing of a star in the Large Magellanic Cloud

Open access
Alcock, C., Akerlof, C. W., Allsman, R. A., Axelrod, T. S., Bennett, D. P., Chan, S., Cook, K. H., Freeman, K. C., Griest, K., Marshall, S. L., Park, H-S., Perlmutter, S., Peterson, B. A., Pratt, M. R., Quinn, P. J., Rodgers, A. W., Stubbs, C. W., Sutherland, W.·1993·Nature

Abstract

THERE is now abundant evidence for the presence of large quantities of unseen matter surrounding normal galaxies, including our own1,2. The nature of this ’dark matter‘ is unknown, except that it cannot be made of normal stars, dust or gas, as they would be easily detected. Exotic particles such as axions, massive neutrinos or other weakly interacting massive particles (collectively known as WIMPs) have been proposed3,4, but have yet to be detected. A less exotic alternative is normal matter in the form of bodies with masses ranging from that of a large planet to a few solar masses. Such objects, known collectively as massive compact halo objects5 (MACHOs), might be brown dwarfs or ‘jupiters’ (bodies too small to produce their own energy by fusion), neutron stars, old white dwarfs or black holes. Paczynski6 suggested that MACHOs might act as gravitational microlenses, temporarily amplifying the apparent brightness of background stars in nearby galaxies. We are conducting a microlensing experiment to determine whether the dark matter halo of our Galaxy is made up of MACHOs. Here we report a candidate for such a microlensing event, detected by monitoring the light curves of 1.8 million stars in the Large Magellanic Cloud for one year. The light curve shows no variation for most of the year of data taking, and an upward excursion lasting over 1 month, with a maximum increase of ∼2 mag. The most probable lens mass, inferred from the duration of the candidate lensing event, is ∼0.1 solar mass.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/365621a0

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 767

Metadata

Authors
Alcock, C., Akerlof, C. W., Allsman, R. A., Axelrod, T. S., Bennett, D. P., Chan, S., Cook, K. H., Freeman, K. C., Griest, K., Marshall, S. L., Park, H.-S., Perlmutter, S., Peterson, B. A., Pratt, M. R., Quinn, P. J., Rodgers, A. W., Stubbs, C. W., & Sutherland, W.
Venue
Nature
Published
1993-10-01
Volume
365
Issue
6447
Pages
621-623
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W1977586499
Cited by
767
References
0
FWCI
45.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Possible gravitational microlensing of a star in the Large Magellanic Cloud. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/365621a0
The paper
Alcock, C., Akerlof, C. W., Allsman, R. A., Axelrod, T. S., Bennett, D. P., Chan, S., Cook, K. H., Freeman, K. C., Griest, K., Marshall, S. L., Park, H.-S., Perlmutter, S., Peterson, B. A., Pratt, M. R., Quinn, P. J., Rodgers, A. W., Stubbs, C. W., & Sutherland, W. (1993). Possible gravitational microlensing of a star in the Large Magellanic Cloud. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/365621a0

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.