Sympatric speciation suggested by monophyly of crater lake cichlids

Schliewen, Ulrich K., Tautz, Diethard, Pääbo, Svante·1994·Nature

DOI 10.1038/368629a0

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/368629a0

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Hybridization and adaptive radiation
Seehausen, O. (2004) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2004.01.003 · Cited by 1,627
Adaptive radiation: Contrasting theory with data
Gavrilets, S., & Losos, J. B. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1157966 · Cited by 750
Sympatric speciation in palms on an oceanic island
Savolainen, V., Anstett, M.-C., Lexer, C., Hutton, I., Clarkson, J. J., Norup, M. V., Powell, M. P., Springate, D., Salamin, N., & Baker, W. J. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04566 · Cited by 681
Speciation has a spatial scale that depends on levels of gene flow
Kisel, Y., & Barraclough, T. G. (2010) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/650369 · Cited by 496
Autopolyploidy in angiosperms: Have we grossly underestimated the number of species?
(2007) · Taxon · doi:10.2307/25065732 · Cited by 452

Authors: Schliewen, U. K., Tautz, D., & Pääbo, S.
Venue: Nature
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published: 1994-04
Volume: 368
Issue: 6472
Pages: 629-632
ISSN: 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
1476-4687
DOI: 10.1038/368629a0
OpenAlex: W1991347848
Cited by: 450
References: 0
FWCI: 4.90
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review