The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Mycorrhizae alter quality and quantity of carbon allocated below ground
Abstract
PLANTS and soils are a critically important element in the global carbon–energy equation. It is estimated that in forest ecosystems over two-thirds of the carbon is contained in soils and peat deposits1. Despite the importance of forest soils in the global car-bon cycle, fluxes of carbon associated with fundamental processes and soil functional groups are inadequately quantified, limiting our understanding of carbon movement and sequestration in soils. We report here the direct measurement of carbon in and through all major pools of a mycorrhizal (fungus-root) coniferous seedling (a complete carbon budget). The mycorrhizal symbiont reduces over-all retention of carbon in the plant–fungus symbiosis by increasing carbon in roots and below-ground respiration and reducing its retention and release above ground. Below ground, mycorrhizal plants shifted allocation of carbon to pools that are rapidly turned over, primarily to fine roots and fungal hyphae, and host root and fungal respiration. Mycorrhizae alter the size of below-ground carbon pools, the quality and, therefore, the retention time of carbon below ground. Our data indicate that if elevated atmos-pheric CO2 and altered climate stressors alter mycorrhizal colonization in forests, the role of forests in sequestering carbon could be altered.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Eissenstat, D. M., & Yanai, R. D. (1997) · Advances in Ecological Research · doi:10.1016/s0065-2504(08)60005-7 · Cited by 818
van Hees, P. A. W., Jones, D. L., Finlay, R., Godbold, D. L., & Lundström, U. S. (2005) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.06.010 · Cited by 653
Plant-microbe-soil interactions in the rhizosphere: an evolutionary perspective
Lambers, H., Mougel, C., Jaillard, B., & Hinsinger, P. (2009) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-009-0042-x · Cited by 630
Mycorrhizal networks: Mechanisms, ecology and modelling
Simard, S. W., Beiler, K. J., Bingham, M. A., Deslippe, J. R., Philip, L. J., & Teste, F. P. (2012) · Fungal Biology Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.fbr.2012.01.001 · Cited by 593
Högberg, M. N., & Högberg, P. (2002) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1046/j.1469-8137.2002.00417.x · Cited by 522
Vogt, K. A., Vogt, D. J., & Bloomfield, J. (1998) · Root Demographics and Their Efficiencies in Sustainable Agriculture, Grasslands and Forest Ecosystems · doi:10.1007/978-94-011-5270-9_61 · Cited by 414
Mycorrhizal mycelium as a global carbon pool
Hawkins, H.-J., Cargill, R. I. M., Van Nuland, M. E., Hagen, S. C., Field, K. J., Sheldrake, M., Soudzilovskaia, N. A., & Kiers, E. T. (2023) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2023.02.027 · Cited by 412
Vogt, K. A., Vogt, D. J., & Bloomfield, J. (1998) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1023/a:1004313515294 · Cited by 371
Plastic plants and patchy soils
Hodge, A. (2006) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/eri280 · Cited by 342
Metadata
- Authors
- Rygiewicz, P. T., & Andersen, C. P.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 1994-05
- Volume
- 369
- Issue
- 6475
- Pages
- 58-60
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2043563374
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.