CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 68

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Mariner transposons in humans

Oosumi, T., Belknap, W. R., Garlick, B.·1995·Nature
DOI 10.1038/378672a0
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/378672a0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Robertson, H. M. J. Insect Physiol. 41, 99–105 (1995). · DOI
  2. Sedensky, M. M., Hudson, S. J., Everson, B. & Morgan, P. G. Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 1719–1723 (1994). · DOI
  3. Garcia-Fernandez, J. et al. Molec. Biol. Evol. 12, 421–431 (1995).
  4. Jacobson, J. W., Medhora, M. M. & Hartl, D. L. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 83, 8684–8688 (1986). · DOI
  5. Federoff, N., Wessler, S. & Shure, M. Cell 35, 235–242 (1983). · DOI
  6. Oosumi, T., Garlick, B. & Belknap, W. R. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 92, 8886–8890 (1995). · DOI
  7. Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E.W. & Lipman, D.J. J. molec. Biol. 215, 403–410 (1990). · DOI · Paper page
  8. Robertson, H. M. & MacLeod E. G. insect molec. Biol. 2, 125–139 (1993). · DOI
  9. Aug-Gouillou et al. FEBS Lett. 368, 541–546 (1995). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 68

Metadata

Authors
Oosumi, T., Belknap, W. R., & Garlick, B.
Venue
Nature
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
1995-12-14
Volume
378
Issue
6558
Pages
672-672
ISSN
  • 0028-0836
  • 1476-4687
DOI
10.1038/378672a0
Cited by
68
References
0
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review