Cited by 1,235Stellar, planetary, and galactic studiesAstro and Planetary ScienceAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies

Orbital migration of the planetary companion of 51 Pegasi to its present location

Lin, D. N. C., Bodenheimer, P., Richardson, D. C.·1996·Nature

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/380606a0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lin, D. N. C., Bodenheimer, P., & Richardson, D. C.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Venue
Nature
Published
1996-04
Volume
380
Issue
6575
Pages
606-607
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W1967245741
Cited by
1,235
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 37 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 56 · 2017: 52 · 2016: 63 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 52 · 2013: 45 · 2012: 55
FWCI
29.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • University Libraries (University of Maryland) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Keywords
51 Pegasi b, exoplanets, planet migration, planet formation, circumstellar disks, gas capture, tidal interactions, stellar magnetospheres, disk truncation, radial velocity variations, gas giant planets

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review