The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Leading-edge vortices in insect flight
Open accessAbstract
INSECTS cannot fly, according to the conventional laws of aerodynamics: during flapping flight, their wings produce more lift than during steady motion at the same velocities and angles of attack1–5. Measured instantaneous lift forces also show qualitative and quantitative disagreement with the forces predicted by conventional aerodynamic theories6–9. The importance of high-life aerodynamic mechanisms is now widely recognized but, except for the specialized fling mechanism used by some insect species1,10–13, the source of extra lift remains unknown. We have now visualized the airflow around the wings of the hawkmoth Manduca sexta and a 'hovering' large mechanical model—the flapper. An intense leading-edge vortex was found on the down-stroke, of sufficient strength to explain the high-lift forces. The vortex is created by dynamic stall, and not by the rotational lift mechanisms that have been postulated for insect flight14–16. The vortex spirals out towards the wingtip with a spanwise velocity comparable to the flapping velocity. The three-dimensional flow is similar to the conical leading-edge vortex found on delta wings, with the spanwise flow stabilizing the vortex.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
How animals move: an integrative view
Dickinson, M. H., Farley, C. T., Full, R. J., Koehl, M. A. R., Kram, R., & Lehman, S. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.288.5463.100 · Cited by 1,633
Classifications, applications, and design challenges of drones: A review
Hassanalian, M., & Abdelkefi, A. (2017) · Progress in Aerospace Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.paerosci.2017.04.003 · Cited by 1,454
Review of Experimental Work in Biomimetic Foils
Triantafyllou, M. S., Techet, A. H., & Hover, F. S. (2004) · IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering · doi:10.1109/joe.2004.833216 · Cited by 448
The aerodynamics of revolving wings I. Model hawkmoth wings
Usherwood, J. R., & Ellington, C. P. (2002) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.205.11.1547 · Cited by 398
Self-citationFlapping flight for biomimetic robotic insects: part I-system modeling
Deng, X., Schenato, L., Wu, W. C., & Sastry, S. S. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Robotics · doi:10.1109/tro.2006.875480 · Cited by 355
Metadata
- Authors
- Ellington, C. P., van den Berg, C., Willmott, A. P., & Thomas, A. L. R.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 1996-12
- Volume
- 384
- Issue
- 6610
- Pages
- 626-630
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2080524911
- Cited by
- 1,750
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 28.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Leading-edge vortices in insect flight. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/384626a0
- The paper
- Ellington, C. P., van den Berg, C., Willmott, A. P., & Thomas, A. L. R. (1996). Leading-edge vortices in insect flight. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/384626a0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.