Cited by 9,536Breast Cancer Treatment StudiesGene expression and cancer classificationBreast Lesions and Carcinomas

Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer

Open access
van 't Veer, Laura J., Dai, Hongyue, van de Vijver, Marc J., He, Yudong D., Hart, Augustinus A. M., Mao, Mao, Peterse, Hans L., van der Kooy, Karin +8 more·2002·Nature

Abstract

Breast cancer patients with the same stage of disease can have markedly different treatment responses and overall outcome. The strongest predictors for metastases (for example, lymph node status and histological grade) fail to classify accurately breast tumours according to their clinical behaviour. Chemotherapy or hormonal therapy reduces the risk of distant metastases by approximately one-third; however, 70-80% of patients receiving this treatment would have survived without it. None of the signatures of breast cancer gene expression reported to date allow for patient-tailored therapy strategies. Here we used DNA microarray analysis on primary breast tumours of 117 young patients, and applied supervised classification to identify a gene expression signature strongly predictive of a short interval to distant metastases ('poor prognosis' signature) in patients without tumour cells in local lymph nodes at diagnosis (lymph node negative). In addition, we established a signature that identifies tumours of BRCA1 carriers. The poor prognosis signature consists of genes regulating cell cycle, invasion, metastasis and angiogenesis. This gene expression profile will outperform all currently used clinical parameters in predicting disease outcome. Our findings provide a strategy to select patients who would benefit from adjuvant therapy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/415530a

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 29 · Cited by 9,536

Authors
van 't Veer, L. J., Dai, H., van de Vijver, M. J., He, Y. D., Hart, A. A. M., Mao, M., Peterse, H. L., van der Kooy, K., Marton, M. J., Witteveen, A. T., Schreiber, G. J., Kerkhoven, R. M., Roberts, C., Linsley, P. S., Bernards, R., & Friend, S. H.
Affiliations
The Netherlands Cancer Institute (NL)
Corresponding author
Friend, Stephen H.
Venue
Nature
Published
2002-01
Volume
415
Issue
6871
Pages
530-536
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2128985829
Cited by
9,536
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 86 · 2025: 129 · 2024: 171 · 2023: 275 · 2022: 243 · 2021: 272 · 2020: 293 · 2019: 286 · 2018: 288 · 2017: 370 · 2016: 342 · 2015: 385 · 2014: 444 · 2013: 531 · 2012: 493
FWCI
187.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Breast Lesions and Carcinomas
Keywords
breast cancer, gene expression signatures, prognosis, distant metastasis, node-negative breast cancer, BRCA1 mutation carriers, adjuvant therapy selection, cell cycle genes, tumor invasion, angiogenesis, DNA microarrays, supervised classification
MeSH terms
Adult, Breast Neoplasms, DNA, Neoplasm, Female, Humans, Lymphatic Metastasis, Predictive Value of Tests, Prognosis, Cluster Analysis, Treatment Outcome, Chemotherapy, Adjuvant, Patient Selection, Genes, BRCA1, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis, Gene Expression Profiling, Genes, BRCA2

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review