Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer
Open accessAbstract
Breast cancer patients with the same stage of disease can have markedly different treatment responses and overall outcome. The strongest predictors for metastases (for example, lymph node status and histological grade) fail to classify accurately breast tumours according to their clinical behaviour. Chemotherapy or hormonal therapy reduces the risk of distant metastases by approximately one-third; however, 70-80% of patients receiving this treatment would have survived without it. None of the signatures of breast cancer gene expression reported to date allow for patient-tailored therapy strategies. Here we used DNA microarray analysis on primary breast tumours of 117 young patients, and applied supervised classification to identify a gene expression signature strongly predictive of a short interval to distant metastases ('poor prognosis' signature) in patients without tumour cells in local lymph nodes at diagnosis (lymph node negative). In addition, we established a signature that identifies tumours of BRCA1 carriers. The poor prognosis signature consists of genes regulating cell cycle, invasion, metastasis and angiogenesis. This gene expression profile will outperform all currently used clinical parameters in predicting disease outcome. Our findings provide a strategy to select patients who would benefit from adjuvant therapy.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Gene expression profiling has already been used to identify genes that could serve as molecular markers of cancer classification and outcome prediction.
“In fact, this approach has already been used to identify genes that could serve as molecular markers of cancer classification and outcome prediction (10-14).”
From Prediction of the response to chemotherapy in advanced esophageal cancer by gene expression profiling of biopsy samples (2010) · cites this paper as [11]
MAD2 clusters with tens of genes capable of predicting disease outcome in breast cancer patients.
“Interestingly, MAD2 also clusters with tens of genes capable of predicting disease outcome in breast cancer patients 22 .”
From Rb inactivation promotes genomic instability by uncoupling cell cycle progression from mitotic control (2004) · cites this paper as [22]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 29 · Cited by 9,536
- Authors
- van 't Veer, L. J., Dai, H., van de Vijver, M. J., He, Y. D., Hart, A. A. M., Mao, M., Peterse, H. L., van der Kooy, K., Marton, M. J., Witteveen, A. T., Schreiber, G. J., Kerkhoven, R. M., Roberts, C., Linsley, P. S., Bernards, R., & Friend, S. H.
- Affiliations
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Friend, Stephen H.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2002-01
- Volume
- 415
- Issue
- 6871
- Pages
- 530-536
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2128985829
- Cited by
- 9,536
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 86 · 2025: 129 · 2024: 171 · 2023: 275 · 2022: 243 · 2021: 272 · 2020: 293 · 2019: 286 · 2018: 288 · 2017: 370 · 2016: 342 · 2015: 385 · 2014: 444 · 2013: 531 · 2012: 493
- FWCI
- 187.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Breast Lesions and Carcinomas
- Keywords
- breast cancer, gene expression signatures, prognosis, distant metastasis, node-negative breast cancer, BRCA1 mutation carriers, adjuvant therapy selection, cell cycle genes, tumor invasion, angiogenesis, DNA microarrays, supervised classification
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Breast Neoplasms, DNA, Neoplasm, Female, Humans, Lymphatic Metastasis, Predictive Value of Tests, Prognosis, Cluster Analysis, Treatment Outcome, Chemotherapy, Adjuvant, Patient Selection, Genes, BRCA1, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis, Gene Expression Profiling, Genes, BRCA2
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review