Good governance for geoengineering
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Adapting the Stage-Gate framework can systematize exit ramps integration.
“Adapting the Stage-Gate framework, a phased governance model with decision points ('gates') to evaluate progress against predefined criteria, can systematize exit ramps integration”
From Past Field Experiments of Solar Radiation Modification: A Review of the Scientific and Technical Aspects for Governance (2026) · cites this paper as MacNaghten & Owen, 2011
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 1 · Cited by 111
- Authors
- Macnaghten, P., & Owen, R.
- Affiliations
- Durham University (GB)
- University of Exeter (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Macnaghten, Phil
- Owen, Richard
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2011-11-16
- Volume
- 479
- Issue
- 7373
- Pages
- 293-293
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2022756557
- Cited by
- 111
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 9.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Economic and Social Research Council (RES-077-26-0001)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate Change and Geoengineering
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
- Keywords
- geoengineering governance, geoengineering, research governance, ethics of geoengineering
- MeSH terms
- Ecology, United Kingdom, Research, Global Warming, Environmental Policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
