The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Interdisciplinary research by the numbers
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Nowadays, interdisciplinary research is on the rise (Van Noorden, 2015), and research methods from different disciplines also continue to merge.”
From MOPRD: A multidisciplinary open peer review dataset (2022) · cites this paper as Van Noorden, 2015
In the citing paper
“Nowadays, interdisciplinary research is on the rise (Van Noorden, 2015), and research methods from different disciplines also continue to merge.”
From MOPRD: A multidisciplinary open peer review dataset (2022) · cites this paper as Van Noorden, 2015
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Interdisciplinary research has consistently lower funding success
Bromham, L. D., Dinnage, R., & Hua, X. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature18315 · Cited by 602
MaruÅ¡iÄ, M., & MaruÅ¡iÄ, A. (2014) · Palgrave Macmillan eBooks · doi:10.1057/9781137351197.0020 · Cited by 503
The science of science: From the perspective of complex systems
Zeng, A., Shen, Z., Zhou, J., Wu, J., Fan, Y., Wang, Y., & Stanley, E. (2017) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.10.001 · Cited by 420
Challenges and emerging directions in single-cell analysis
Yuan, G., Cai, L., Elowitz, M. B., Enver, T., Fan, G., Guo, G., Irizarry, R. A., Kharchenko, P. V., Kim, J., Orkin, S. H., et al. (2017) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-017-1218-y · Cited by 349
The Open Innovation in Science research field: a collaborative conceptualisation approach
Beck, S., Bergenholtz, C., Bogers, M. L. A. M., Brasseur, T.-M., Conradsen, M. L., Marco, D. D., Distel, A. P., Dobusch, L., Dörler, D., Effert, A., et al. (2020) · Industry and Innovation · doi:10.1080/13662716.2020.1792274 · Cited by 284
Metadata
- Authors
- Van Noorden, R.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2015-09-16
- Volume
- 525
- Issue
- 7569
- Pages
- 306-307
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W1869470212
- Cited by
- 443
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 27 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 59 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 46 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 7
- Type
- other
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Research, Science, and Academia
- Keywords
- interdisciplinary research, research impact, citation analysis, bibliometric analysis, research collaboration
- MeSH terms
- Publishing, Research, Bibliometrics, Interdisciplinary Communication, Internationality, Interdisciplinary Studies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
