Reproducibility: A tragedy of errors

Allison, David B., Brown, Andrew W., George, Brandon J., Kaiser, Kathryn A.·2016·Nature
DOI 10.1038/530027a

Cited by (256)

Items 101–200 of 256

  1. Post-publication peer review in biomedical journals: overcoming obstacles and disincentives to knowledge sharing
    Karen Shashok, Valerie Matarese · 2018 · Riviste UNIMI (Università degli studi di Milano)
  2. Warum ist die „Anzahl vorzeitiger Todesfälle durch Umweltexpositionen“ nicht angemessen quantifizierbar?
    Peter Morfeld, Thomas C. Erren · 2019 · Das Gesundheitswesen
  3. Appetite‐Related Responses to Overfeeding and Longitudinal Weight Change in Obesity‐Prone and Obesity‐Resistant Adults
    Tanya M. Halliday, Corey A. Rynders, Elizabeth Thomas, Audrey Bergouignan, Zhaoxing Pan, Elizabeth H. Kealey, Marc‐André Cornier, Daniel H. Bessesen · 2020 · Obesity
  4. From Model Organisms to Humans, the Opportunity for More Rigor in Methodologic and Statistical Analysis, Design, and Interpretation of Aging and Senescence Research
    Daniella E. Chusyd, Steven N. Austad, Andrew William Brown, Xiwei Chen, Stephanie Dickinson, Keisuke Ejima, David Fluharty, Lilian Golzarri‐Arroyo, Richard J. Holden, Yasaman Jamshidi‐Naeini et al. · 2021 · The Journals of Gerontology Series A
  5. Can horses read emotional cues from human faces? Re-analysis of Smith et al. (2016)
    Tim Schmoll · 2016 · Biology Letters
  6. Inaccuracy in the Scientific Record and Open Postpublication Critique
    Chris R. Brewin · 2023 · Perspectives on Psychological Science
  7. Perspective on scientific truth versus scientific evidence; maintaining integrity in global food systems
    Peer Ederer · 2024 · Animal Production Science
  8. Nextflow : un outil efficace pour l’amélioration de la stabilité numérique des calculs en analyse génomique
    Paolo Di Tommaso, Evan W. Floden, Cedrik Magis, Emilio Palumbo, Cédric Notredame · 2017 · Biologie Aujourd hui
  9. The changing landscape of scientific publishing
    Luis A. Chiriboga · 2019 · Journal of Histotechnology
  10. Pathways to a Shiny Future: Building the Foundation for Computational Physical Chemistry and Biophysics in 2050
    Denys Biriukov, Robert Vácha · 2024 · ACS Physical Chemistry Au
  11. Experimental Designs and Statistical Analyses for Rootstock Trials
    Richard P. Marini · 2024 · Agronomy
  12. Truth in Science Publishing: A Personal Perspective
    Thomas Christian Südhof · 2016 · PLoS Biology
  13. Perceived Statistical Knowledge Level and Self-Reported Statistical Practice Among Academic Psychologists
    Laura Badenes‐Ribera, María Dolores Frías Navarro, Nathalie Ophelia Iotti, Amparo Bonilla Campos, Claudio Longobardi · 2018 · Frontiers in Psychology
  14. From data sharing to data publishing
    Jean‐Baptiste Poline · 2019 · MNI Open Research
  15. Zika virus: accurate terminology matters
    J. Pergl, P. Genovesi, P. Pyšek · 2016 · Nature
  16. FAIRsoft - A practical implementation of FAIR principles for research software
    Eva Martín del Pico, Josep Lluis Gelpí, Salvador Capella-Gutiérrez · 2022 · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  17. Are female scientists underrepresented in self-retractions for honest error?
    Mariana Dias Ribeiro, Jesús Pascual Mena‐Chalco, Karina de Albuquerque Rocha, Marlise Pedrotti, Patrick Menezes, Sonia M. R. Vasconcelos · 2023 · Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics
  18. Drug discovery today: no molecules required
    Alexander Y. Panchin, Хромов-Борисов Никита Николаевич, Evgenia V. Dueva · 2018 · BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine
  19. A bibliometric study on the publication errors in emergency medicine journals from 2000 to 2020
    Sevilay Vural, Hasan Burak Kaya, Figen Çoşkun · 2022 · The American Journal of Emergency Medicine
  20. The research literature is an unsafe workplace
    Jennifer Anne Byrne, Adrian Gerard Barnett · 2024 · Accountability in Research
  21. Science of Science
    Alexander Krauß · 2024
  22. Reproducibility of biomarker identifications from mass spectrometry proteomic data in cancer studies
    Yulan Liang, Adam Kelemen, Arpad Kelemen · 2019 · Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology
  23. Amending the literature through version control
    Adam Kane, Bawan Amin · 2023 · Biology Letters
  24. Determination of sex differences requires formal test for differences: Comment on “lipoprotein‐subclass particle numbers in children with abdominal obesity”
    Colby J. Vorland, Lilian Golzarri‐Arroyo, Donna L. Maney, Andrew William Brown · 2023 · Pediatrics International
  25. Correcting the Scholarly Record in the Aftermath of Plagiarism: A Snapshot of Current‐Day Publishing Practices in Philosophy
    M. V. Dougherty · 2017 · Metaphilosophy
  26. Premature deaths attributed to ambient air pollutants: let us interpret the Robins–Greenland theorem correctly
    Peter Morfeld, Thomas C. Erren · 2016 · International Journal of Public Health
  27. The Controversy behind the Controversies: Scientific Discourse in the Twenty-First Century
    Jeanne Fahnestock · 2025 · Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  28. Data Management: The First Step in Reproducible Research
    Soundarya Soundararajan, SukhDev Mishra · 2023 · Indian Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
  29. From insight network to open policy practice: practical experiences
    Jouni T. Tuomisto, Mikko Pohjola, Teemu Rintala · 2020 · Health Research Policy and Systems
  30. Contrary to the Conclusions Stated in the Paper, Only Dry Fat-Free Mass Was Different between Groups upon Reanalysis. Comment on: “Intermittent Energy Restriction Attenuates the Loss of Fat-Free Mass in Resistance Trained Individuals. A Randomized Controlled Trial”
    Jackson Peos, Andrew William Brown, Colby J. Vorland, David B. Allison, Amanda Sainsbury · 2020 · Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology
  31. Exploring arXiv usage habits among Slovenian scientists
    Zala Metelko, Jasna Maver · 2023 · Journal of Documentation
  32. The Future of van der Waals Force-Enabled Technology Transfer into the Aerospace Marketplace
    Fabrizio Pinto · 2019 · Elsevier eBooks
  33. The daily Self-Weighing for Obesity Management in Primary Care Study: Rationale, design and methodology
    Gareth R. Dutton, Amber W. Kinsey, Carrie R. Howell, Maria Pisu, Amy Dobelstein, David B. Allison, Pengcheng Xun, David A. Levitsky, Kevin R. Fontaine · 2021 · Contemporary Clinical Trials
  34. Regression to the mean, apparent data errors and biologically extraordinary results: letter regarding ‘changes in telomere length 3–5 years after gastric bypass surgery’
    Daniel L. Smith, Diana Maria Thomas, Chetverikov SIu, Simon Verhulst, David B. Allison · 2017 · International Journal of Obesity
  35. The stated conclusions are contradicted by the data, based on inappropriate statistics, and should be corrected: comment on ‘intervention for childhood obesity based on parents only or parents and child compared with follow‐up alone’
    John Dawson, Andrew William Brown, David B. Allison · 2018 · Pediatric Obesity
  36. The impact of using biased performance metrics on software defect prediction research
    Jingxiu Yao, Martin Shepperd · 2021 · arXiv (Cornell University)
  37. Post-publication peer review in biomedical journals: overcoming obstacles and disincentives to knowledge sharing
    Valerie Matarese, Karen Shashok · 2018
  38. Effect of Radioiodine Treatment on Quality of Life in Patients with Subclinical Hyperthyroidism: A Prospective Controlled Study
    Rolf Larisch, John E. M. Midgley, Johannes W. Dietrich, Rudolf Hoermann · 2024 · Nuklearmedizin - NuclearMedicine
  39. University of Alabama at Birmingham Nathan Shock Center: comparative energetics of aging
    Steven N. Austad, Thomas W. Buford, David B. Allison, Scott W. Ballinger, Andrew William Brown, Christy S. Carter, Victor M. Darley-Usmar, John L. Hartman, Tim R. Nagy, Daniel L. Smith et al. · 2021 · GeroScience
  40. Comment faire de la pseudoscience avec des données réelles : une critique des arguments statistiques de John Hattie dans Visible Learning par un statisticien
    Pierre‐Jérôme Bergeron · 2017 · McGill Journal of Education / Revue des sciences de l'éducation de McGill
  41. Open practices in our science and our courtrooms
    Michael D. Edge, Jeanna Neefe Matthews · 2021 · Trends in Genetics
  42. Murine genetic models of obesity: type I error rates and the power of commonly used analyses as assessed by plasmode-based simulation
    Keisuke Ejima, Andrew William Brown, Daniel L. Smith, Ufuk Beyaztaş, David B. Allison · 2020 · International Journal of Obesity
  43. The reproducibility issue and preclinical academic drug discovery: educational and institutional initiatives fostering translation success
    David R. Janero · 2016 · Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery
  44. Differences in Nominal Significance (DINS) Error leads to invalid conclusions: Letter regarding, “Diet enriched with fresh coconut decreases blood glucose levels and body weight in normal adults”
    Cynthia M. Kroeger, Andrew William Brown, David B. Allison · 2019 · Journal of Complementary and Integrative Medicine
  45. Commentary: Studying a Possible Placebo Effect of an Imaginary Low-Calorie Diet
    Stephanie Dickinson, Greyson Foote, David B. Allison · 2020 · Frontiers in Psychiatry
  46. Artificial Intelligence in Detecting Statistical Errors: Implications for Authors, Reviewers, and Editors
    Alnaimat, Fatima, AlSamhori, Abdel Rahman Feras, El Sharu, Husam, Othman, Leen, Oralbek, Aizhan, Zimba, Olena · 2025 · Journal of Korean Medical Science
  47. The Interoperability Challenge in DFT Workflows Across Implementations
    Simon Krarup Steensen, Tushar Singh Thakur, Manuel Dillenz, Johan Martin Carlsson, Celso R. C. Rêgo, Eibar Flores, Hamidreza Hajiyani, Felix Hanke, Juan María García-Lastra, Wolfgang Wenzel et al. · 2026 · Advanced Intelligent Discovery
  48. Characteristics of correction practice and its citation in library and information science journals
    Siluo Yang, Heyu Diao, Yifan Zou, Aoxia Xiao · 2022 · Journal of Librarianship and Information Science
  49. The Scandal of Academic Publishing
    Stuart Macdonald · 2025 · Publishing Research Quarterly
  50. Scientific Visualization and Reproducibility for "Open" Environmental Science
    Judith Bayard Cushing, Denise H. Lach, Chad M. Zanocco, Jonathan J. Halama · 2018 · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData)
  51. The long life of unicorns
    Raphaël Lévy, Yasemin J. Erden · 2020 · Precision Nanomedicine
  52. Computer Science of Science
    Alexander Krauß · 2024 · Oxford University Press eBooks
  53. Proporción y distribución de erratas en publicaciones científicas
    Juan Antonio Pichardo-Corpus, J. G. Contreras, José Antonio de la Peña · 2019 · Investigación Bibliotecológica Archivonomía Bibliotecología e Información
  54. Back to basics: Avoiding errors in scientific research and publications
    Bojana Obradović · 2019 · Hemijska industrija
  55. Above a Swamp: A Theory of High-Quality Scientific Production
    Bralind Kiri, Nicola Lacetera, Lorenzo Zirulia · 2015 · National Bureau of Economic Research
  56. Traditional peer review and post-publication peer review
    Lindy Luo, Fraser Douglas Rubens · 2016 · Perfusion
  57. Incorrect analyses were used in “Different enteral nutrition formulas have no effect on glucose homeostasis but on diet-induced thermogenesis in critically ill medical patients: a randomized controlled trial” and corrected analyses are requested
    Stephanie Dickinson, Andrew William Brown, Tapan S. Mehta, Steven B. Heymsfield, Cara B. Ebbeling, David S. Ludwig, David B. Allison · 2018 · European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
  58. Investing in open and FAIR practices for more usable and equitable climate-risk research
    Adam B. Pollack, Lisa Auermuller, Casey Burleyson, J. Campbell, Madison Condon, Courtney Marie Cooper, Matteo Coronese, Sönke Dangendorf, James Doss‐Gollin, Prabhat Hegde et al. · 2023
  59. Scientific reasoning driven by influential data: resuscitate dfstat !
    Andrej‐Nikolai Spiess, Stefan Rödiger, Matthias Schaks, Michał Burdukiewicz, Joel Tellinghuisen · 2024 · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  60. On and off-the-record correction practices: A survey-based study of how chemistry researchers react to errors
    Frédérique Bordignon · 2025 · Accountability in Research
  61. BIEN : A biodiversity informatics ecosystem advancing open and reproducible workflows for plant observation, plot and trait data
    Brian Joseph Enquist, Brad L. Boyle, Brian Maitner, Cory Merow, Ben Carlson, Xiao Feng, Gabriel Massaine MOULATLET, Erica A. Newman, Daniel Park, Michiel Pillet et al. · 2026 · Methods in Ecology and Evolution
  62. The reproducibility crisis in phylogenetic analyses
    Pedro Lorena Godoy, Daniel Casali, Julie Meachen, Adriana López‐Arbarello, Michael Daniel D’Emic · 2026 · Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology
  63. Removing wolves did not reliably prevent domestic animal losses
    Adrian Treves, Dror Ben‐Ami, Ari M. Cornman, Martin Duľa, Igor Khorozyan, Miha Krofel, Miroslav Kutal, José Vicente López‐Bao, Rona Nadler Valency, Shlomo Preiss-Bloom et al. · 2026 · Conservation Science and Practice
  64. Scholarly Publishing and Scientific Reproducibility
    Arieh Bomzon, Graham Tobin · 2021 · Laboratory animal science and medicine
  65. Information
    William Hersh · 2020 · Health informatics
  66. Plagiarism in Philosophy Research
    M. V. Dougherty · 2022 · Springer eBooks
  67. Environmental toxicology without chemistry and publications without discourse: Linked impediments to better science
    Christopher A. Mebane, Joseph S. Meyer · 2016 · Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
  68. A Test Case for Published Corrections: The Discipline of Philosophy
    M. V. Dougherty · 2018 · Research ethics forum
  69. Evidence of misuse of nonparametric tests in the presence of heteroscedasticity within obesity research
    Cynthia M. Kroeger, Bridget A. Hannon, Tanya M. Halliday, Keisuke Ejima, Margarita Terán-Garcı́a, Andrew William Brown · 2021 · F1000Research
  70. The Conclusions Are Unsupported by the Data, Are Based on Invalid Analyses, Are Incorrect, and Should be Corrected
    David B. Allison · 2018 · International Journal of Yoga
  71. Comparisons of Within-Group Instead of Between-Group Affect the Conclusions. Comment on: “Changes in Weight and Substrate Oxidation in Overweight Adults Following Isomaltulose Intake during a 12-Week Weight Loss Intervention: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial”. Nutrients 2019, 11(10), 2367
    Colby J. Vorland, Theodore K. Kyle, Andrew William Brown · 2020 · Nutrients
  72. Childhood obesity intervention studies: A narrative review and guide for investigators, authors, editors, reviewers, journalists, and readers to guard against exaggerated effectiveness claims
    Brown AW, Douglas G. Altman, Tom Baranowski, JM Bland, Dawson Ja, NV Dhurandhar, Shima A. Dowla, Fontaine KR, Amy Gelman, SB Heymsfield et al. · 2020 · Yearbook of pediatric endocrinology
  73. Letter to the Editor And response Letter to the Editor and Author Response of Assessment of a Health Promotion Model on Obese Turkish Children. The Journal of Nursing Research, 25(6), 436–446
    Andrew William Brown, David B. Allison · 2018 · Journal of Nursing Research
  74. Conditioning on “study” is essential for valid inference when combining individual data from multiple randomized controlled trials: a comment on Reesor et al's School‐based weight management program curbs summer weight gain among low‐income Hispanic middle school students. J Sch Health. 2019;89(1):59‐67
    Wasantha Parakrama Jayawardene, Andrew William Brown, John Dawson, Chanaka Nadeeshan Kahathuduwa, Bryan McComb, David B. Allison · 2019 · Journal of School Health
  75. Within-group comparisons led to unsubstantiated conclusions in “Low-phytate wholegrain bread instead of high-phytate wholegrain bread in a total diet context did not improve iron status of healthy Swedish females: a 12-week, randomized, parallel-design intervention Study”
    Colby J. Vorland, Luis Miguel Mestre, Sachintha S. Mendis, Andrew William Brown · 2020 · European Journal of Nutrition
  76. Invited Commentary: Code Review—An Important Step Toward Reproducible Research
    Robert William Platt · 2021 · American Journal of Epidemiology
  77. Replication and Reproducibility and the Self-Correction of Science: What Can JID Innovations Do?
    Russell P. Hall · 2023 · JID Innovations
  78. History of Science
    Alexander Krauß · 2024 · Oxford University Press eBooks
  79. Science of Science: An Integrated and Methods-Driven Understanding of Science
    Alexander Krauß · 2024 · Oxford University Press eBooks
  80. Accuracy and distribution of baseline categorical variables and p -values in spine randomized controlled trials
    Mark J Bolland, Alison Avenell, Andrew B. Grey · 2025 · Royal Society Open Science
  81. Misleading biases in methods for estimating wolf abundance using spatial models
    Robert L. Crabtree, Mary M. Conner, Adrian Treves · 2025 · Academia Biology
  82. Unlocking the benefits of transparent and reusable science for climate risk management
    Adam B. Pollack, Lisa Auermuller, Casey Burleyson, J. Campbell, Madison Condon, Courtney Marie Cooper, Matteo Coronese, Sönke Dangendorf, James Doss‐Gollin, Prabhat Hegde et al. · 2026 · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  83. Irreproducible research and a typology of replication efforts
    Adrian Treves, Sedona Chinn, Miha Krofel · 2026 · Research Integrity and Peer Review
  84. Statistics in a Horticultural Journal: Problems and Solutions
    Matthew Kramer, Ellen T. Paparozzi, Walter W. Stroup · 2016 · HortTechnology
  85. Klinische Ökonomik – Was sie ist, was sie will und weshalb wir sie brauchen
    Franz Porzsolt · 2017 · Gesundheitsökonomie & Qualitätsmanagement
  86. The Characteristics and Diversity of Experimentation in the Sciences
    Catherine Allamel-Raffin, Jean-Luc Gangloff, Yves Gingras · 2024 · Archimedes
  87. A Note on “Response to: Methodological Rigor in Reference Chart Development: A Comment on ‘Normative Reference Centiles for Sprint Performance in High-Level Youth Soccer Players: The Need To Consider Biological Maturity’”
    Lorenzo Lolli · 2024 · Pediatric Exercise Science
  88. Introduction
    Alexander Krauß · 2024 · Oxford University Press eBooks
  89. Physical activity and diet pattern do not mitigate C-reactive protein increases associated with oral contraceptive use
    Eric T. Trexler, David E. Eagle, Herman Pontzer · 2025 · PLoS ONE
  90. How Do Psychology Journals Handle Postpublication Critique? A Cross-Sectional Study of Policy and Practice
    Annie Whamond, Simine Vazire, Beth Clarke, Nicholas Moodie, Sarah R. Schiavone, Robert T. Thibault, Tom Elis Hardwicke · 2025 · Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science
  91. Statistics in a Horticultural Journal: Problems and Solutions
    Matthew Kramer, Ellen T. Paparozzi, Walter W. Stroup · 2016 · HortScience
  92. From data sharing to data publishing
    Jean‐Baptiste Poline · 2018 · MNI Open Research
  93. Comment on “Effect of bariatric surgery on circulating FGF‐19: A systematic review and meta‐analysis”
    Siavash Babajafari, Maryam Shafiee, Mostafa Dianatinasab, Seyed Mohammad Mazloomi · 2021 · Obesity Reviews
  94. Cognitive Science of Science
    Alexander Krauß · 2024 · Oxford University Press eBooks
  95. Using the Nextflow framework for reproducible in-silico omics analyses across clusters and clouds
    Paolo Di Tommaso, Evan W. Floden, Maria Chatzou, Cédric Notredame · 2017
  96. Stated conclusion about industry funding is opposite to what the paper's data show: letter regarding ‘Selective outcome reporting in obesity clinical trials: a cross‐sectional review’
    David B. Allison, Diana Maria Thomas · 2017 · Clinical Obesity
  97. Lowering the p-value threshold to alleviate information crisis in nutritional epidemiology – a possible temporary solution?
    Gabriel Gonçalves da Costa · 2021
  98. Patching Science – amending the literature through version control
    Adam Kane, Bawan Amin · 2022 · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  99. Cochrane reviews expose bias too
    Kay Dickersin, Tianjing Li · 2016 · Nature
  100. Editorial Management: Clinical Research Papers and Science Research Papers
    Jonathan R. Brown, James L. Rutkowski · 2017 · Journal of Oral Implantology