Make climate-change assessments more relevant
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the remaining grey grid cells, trends in precipitation and temperature have not been attributed to human influence on the climate according to the methodology in refs.18 and 19, as applied to CMIP6 models.
“In the remaining grey grid cells (Fig. 2c), trends in precipitation and temperature have not been attributed to human influence on the climate according to the methodology in refs.18 and 19, as applied to CMIP6 models.”
From Machine-learning-based evidence and attribution mapping of 100,000 climate impact studies (2021) · cites this paper as [19]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 10 · Cited by 43
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Rogelj, J. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 16325-16330 (2014).
- Authors
- Hallegatte, S., & Mach, K. J.
- Affiliations
- Carnegie Institution for Science (US)
- ORCID
- Mach, Katharine J.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2016-06-27
- Volume
- 534
- Issue
- 7609
- Pages
- 613-615
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2461152659
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 11.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DORA WSL (Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Climate Change Communication and Perception
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
- Keywords
- climate change research, research relevance, policy making, science-policy interface, communication of research results, climate change assessment
- MeSH terms
- Administrative Personnel, Communication, Goals, International Cooperation, Models, Theoretical, Policy Making, Research Personnel, Risk Assessment, Uncertainty, Climate Change, Environmental Policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review