Shake up conferences
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Numerous reports that decry failures to replicate findings in behavioral and clinical neuroscience have triggered increased emphasis on the importance of replication.
“Numerous reports that decry failures to replicate findings in behavioral and clinical neuroscience have triggered increased emphasis on the importance of replication [1-5].”
From A feature and not a bug: Replication failures can lead to new biology (2026) · cites this paper as [4]
The opening passage (labelled Abstract in our copy; page unavailable) says that much has been written about promoting rigour and reproducibility, supporting the general point that these have received attention. It does not say that reports of failed replications in behavioral and clinical neuroscience triggered that attention; searches for those terms found no such passage. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A feature and not a bug: Replication failures can lead to new biology
Marder, E. (2026) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2026.103268
- Authors
- Silberberg, S. D., Crawford, D. C., Finkelstein, R., Koroshetz, W. J., Blank, R. D., Freeze, H. H., Garrison, H. H., & Seger, Y. R.
- Affiliations
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (US)
- Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology (US)
- Corresponding author
- Silberberg, Shai D.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2017-08-10
- Volume
- 548
- Issue
- 7666
- Pages
- 153-154
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2744900843
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 2.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Academic Publishing and Open Access
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Conferences and Exhibitions Management
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Academic Writing and Publishing
- Keywords
- scientific conferences, emojis, smartphone technology, research integrity
- MeSH terms
- Smartphone, Congresses as Topic, Social Media, Inventions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
