Cited by 946Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Impaired synaptic plasticity and learning in aged amyloid precursor protein transgenic mice

Chapman, Paul F., White, Gail L., Jones, Matthew W., Cooper-Blacketer, Deirdre, Marshall, Vanessa J., Irizarry, Michael, Younkin, Linda, Good, Mark A. +4 more·1999·Nature Neuroscience

Abstract

We investigated synaptic communication and plasticity in hippocampal slices from mice overexpressing mutated 695-amino-acid human amyloid precursor protein (APP695SWE), which show behavioral and histopathological abnormalities simulating Alzheimer's disease. Although aged APP transgenic mice exhibit normal fast synaptic transmission and short term plasticity, they are severely impaired in in-vitro and in-vivo long-term potentiation (LTP) in both the CA1 and dentate gyrus regions of the hippocampus. The LTP deficit was correlated with impaired performance in a spatial working memory task in aged transgenics. These deficits are accompanied by minimal or no loss of presynaptic or postsynaptic elementary structural elements in the hippocampus, suggesting that impairments in functional synaptic plasticity may underlie some of the cognitive deficits in these mice and, possibly, in Alzheimer's patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/6374

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 33 · Cited by 946

Authors
Chapman, P. F., White, G. L., Jones, M. W., Cooper-Blacketer, D., Marshall, V. J., Irizarry, M., Younkin, L., Good, M. A., Bliss, T. V. P., Hyman, B. T., Younkin, S. G., & Hsiao, K. K.
Affiliations
  • Cardiff University (GB)
  • National Institute for Medical Research (GB)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • Mayo Clinic in Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Hsiao, Karen K.
Venue
Nature Neuroscience
Published
1999-03
Volume
2
Issue
3
Pages
271-276
ISSN
  • 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1726
OpenAlex
W1886575365
Cited by
946
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 39 · 2012: 49
FWCI
25.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5k08ag000793-05)
  • National Institute on Aging (AG-08487, K08 AG00793)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS33249, R01NS033249)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
amyloid precursor protein, Alzheimer's disease, synaptic plasticity, long-term potentiation, hippocampus, aging, spatial working memory, synaptic transmission, CA1, dentate gyrus, learning deficits
MeSH terms
Aging, Animals, Hippocampus, Humans, Learning, Memory, Mice, Transgenic, Neuronal Plasticity, Space Perception, Synapses, Amyloid beta-Protein Precursor, Long-Term Potentiation, Dentate Gyrus, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review