Tissue-engineered bone regeneration
Abstract
Bone lesions above a critical size become scarred rather than regenerated, leading to nonunion. We have attempted to obtain a greater degree of regeneration by using a resorbable scaffold with regeneration-competent cells to recreate an embryonic environment in injured adult tissues, and thus improve clinical outcome. We have used a combination of a coral scaffold with in vitro-expanded marrow stromal cells (MSC) to increase osteogenesis more than that obtained with the scaffold alone or the scaffold plus fresh bone marrow. The efficiency of the various combinations was assessed in a large segmental defect model in sheep. The tissue-engineered artificial bone underwent morphogenesis leading to complete recorticalization and the formation of a medullary canal with mature lamellar cortical bone in the most favorable cases. Clinical union never occurred when the defects were left empty or filled with the scaffold alone. In contrast, clinical union was obtained in three out of seven operated limbs when the defects were filled with the tissue-engineered bone.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Repair of large-sized bone defects resulting from severe injury, open fractures, bacterial infections, tumor resection, or congenital genetic disorders constitutes a global clinical challenge.
“Repair of large-sized bone defects resulting from severe injury, open fractures, bacterial infections, tumor resection, or congenital genetic disorders constitutes a global clinical challenge [[1], [2], [3]].”
From Hydrogel scaffold encapsulating MSC-Exos and ZIF-8 promotes bone regeneration via coordinating osteogenesis and immunomodulation (2025) · cites this paper as [1]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 39 · Cited by 1,475
- Authors
- Petite, H., Viateau, V., Bensaïd, W., Meunier, A., de Pollak, C., Bourguignon, M., Oudina, K., Sedel, L., & Guillemin, G.
- Affiliations
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Venue
- Nature Biotechnology
- Published
- 2000-09
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 959-963
- ISSN
- 0733-222X (ISSN-L)
- 1087-0156
- 1546-1696
- OpenAlex
- W1607413909
- Cited by
- 1,475
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 71 · 2017: 58 · 2016: 70 · 2015: 81 · 2014: 89 · 2013: 78 · 2012: 88
- FWCI
- 20.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Mesenchymal stem cell research
- Keywords
- tissue-engineered bone, bone regeneration, critical-size bone defect, nonunion, coral scaffold, bioresorbable scaffolds, mesenchymal stem cells, bone formation, segmental bone defect, sheep model, bone marrow
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Biomedical Engineering, Biotechnology, Bone and Bones, Bone Development, Bone Marrow Cells, Cells, Cultured, Cnidaria, Metatarsus, Radiography, Regeneration, Sheep, Time Factors, Bone Transplantation, Transforming Growth Factor beta, Stromal Cells, Bone Morphogenetic Proteins, Transforming Growth Factor beta1
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review