Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 185

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

EUS-Guided Biliary Drainage With One-Step Placement of a Fully Covered Metal Stent for Malignant Biliary Obstruction: A Prospective Feasibility Study

Park, Do Hyun, Koo, Ja Eun, Oh, Joo, Lee, Young Hee, Moon, Sung-Hoon, Lee, Sang Soo, Seo, Dong-Wan, Lee, Sung-Koo, Kim, Myung-Hwan·2009·The American Journal of Gastroenterology

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided biliary drainage (EUSBD) with plastic stents has been introduced as an alternative to percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) in cases of biliary obstruction when endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is unsuccessful. Although self-expandable metallic stents with a larger diameter might offer long-lasting patency compared with plastic stents, to date, EUSBD with one-step placement of a fully covered self-expandable metal stent (FCSEMS) has not been evaluated. We conducted this study to determine the feasibility and usefulness of EUSBD with one-step placement of FCSEMS. METHODS: A prospective feasibility study on EUSBD with one-step placement of FCSEMS was carried out in 14 patients with malignant biliary obstruction who were candidates for alternative techniques for biliary decompression because of unsuccessful ERCP. RESULTS: The technical and functional success rate was 100% (14/14). Nine patients were treated using the intrahepatic approach. The remaining five patients were treated using the extrahepatic approach. With the intrahepatic approach, two patients showed self-limited pneumoperitoneum. With the extrahepatic approach, no patients had pneumoperitoneum. No bile peritonitis or cholangitis was observed after the procedure in any of the patients treated using the intra- or extrahepatic approach. During follow-up periods (median 6 months), one case of re-intervention (7%, 1/14) necessitated by distal stent migration was observed. CONCLUSIONS: EUSBD with one-step placement of an FCSEMS may be feasible, safe, and effective as an alternative to PTBD in cases of malignant biliary obstruction when ERCP is unsuccessful. Prospective randomized trials of EUSBD with plastic stent vs. EUSBD with FCSEMS may be needed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ajg.2009.254

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 185

Metadata

Authors
Park, D. H., Koo, J. E., Oh, J., Lee, Y. H., Moon, S.-H., Lee, S. S., Seo, D.-W., Lee, S.-K., & Kim, M.-H.
Venue
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2009-06-09
Volume
104
Issue
9
Pages
2168-2174
ISSN
  • 0002-9270 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-0241
OpenAlex
W2080307084
Cited by
185
References
0
FWCI
17.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: EUS-Guided Biliary Drainage With One-Step Placement of a Fully Covered Metal Stent for Malignant Biliary Obstruction: A Prospective Feasibility Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/ajg.2009.254
The paper
Park, D. H., Koo, J. E., Oh, J., Lee, Y. H., Moon, S.-H., Lee, S. S., Seo, D.-W., Lee, S.-K., & Kim, M.-H. (2009). EUS-Guided Biliary Drainage With One-Step Placement of a Fully Covered Metal Stent for Malignant Biliary Obstruction: A Prospective Feasibility Study. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2009.254

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.