The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rate and Predictors of Early/Missed Colorectal Cancers After Colonoscopy in Manitoba: A Population-Based Study
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Many of the colorectal cancers (CRCs) diagnosed within 3 years after a colonoscopy are likely because of lesions missed on the initial colonoscopy. In this population-based study, we investigated the rate and predictors of CRCs diagnosed within 3 years of a colonoscopy. METHODS: We identified individuals 50-80 years of age diagnosed with CRC between 1992 and 2008 from the provincewide Manitoba Cancer Registry. Performance of colonoscopy and history of co-morbidities was determined by linkage to the provincial universal health care insurance provider's physician billing claims and hospital discharges databases. CRCs diagnosed within 6 months of a colonoscopy were categorized as detected CRCs and those 6-36 months after a colonoscopy as early/missed CRCs. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the patient, endoscopist, colonoscopy, and CRC factors associated with early/missed CRCs. RESULTS: Of the 4,883 CRCs included in the study, 388 (7.9%) were early/missed CRCs, with a range of 4.5% of rectum/rectosigmoid cancers in men to 14.4% of transverse colon/splenic flexure cancers in women. Independent risk factors associated with early/missed CRCs included prior colonoscopy, performance of index colonoscopy by family physicians, recent year of CRC diagnosis, and proximal site of CRC. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that approximately 1 in 13 CRCs may be an early/missed CRC, diagnosed after an index colonoscopy in usual clinical practice. Women are more likely to have early/missed CRC. It is unclear if this relates to differences in procedure difficulty, bowel preparation issues, or tumor biology between men and women.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data
Quan, H., Sundararajan, V., Halfon, P., Fong, A., Burnand, B., Luthi, J.-C., Saunders, L. D., Beck, C. A., Feasby, T. E., & Ghali, W. A. (2005) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/01.mlr.0000182534.19832.83 · Cited by 10,669
A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis
Peduzzi, P., Concato, J., Kemper, E., Holford, T. R., & Feinstein, A. R. (1996) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/s0895-4356(96)00236-3 · Cited by 9,655
Screening for Colorectal Cancer
Eddy, D. M. (1990) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-113-5-373 · Cited by 1,200
Bernstein, C. N., Blanchard, J. F., Rawsthorne, P., & Wajda, A. (1999) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009735 · Cited by 667
Self-citationBressler, B., Paszat, L. F., Chen, Z., Rothwell, D. M., Vinden, C., & Rabeneck, L. (2007) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2006.10.027 · Cited by 627
Rex, D., Rahmani, E., Haseman, J., Lemmel, G., Kaster, S., & Buckley, J. (1997) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1016/s0016-5085(97)70213-0 · Cited by 576
Rabeneck, L., Paszat, L. F., Hilsden, R. J., Saskin, R., Leddin, D., Grunfeld, E., Wai, E., Goldwasser, M., Sutradhar, R., & Stukel, T. A. (2008) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2008.08.058 · Cited by 520
Colonoscopic Screening of Average-Risk Women for Colorectal Neoplasia
Schoenfeld, P., Cash, B., Flood, A., Dobhan, R., Eastone, J., Coyle, W., Kikendall, J. W., Kim, H. M., Weiss, D. G., Emory, T., et al. (2005) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa042990 · Cited by 489
Factors Associated With Incomplete Colonoscopy: A Population-Based Study
Shah, H. A., Paszat, L. F., Saskin, R., Stukel, T. A., & Rabeneck, L. (2007) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2007.03.032 · Cited by 358
Colonoscopic miss rates for right-sided colon cancer: A population-based analysis
Bressler, B., Paszat, L. F., Vinden, C., Li, C., He, J., & Rabeneck, L. (2004) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2004.05.032 · Cited by 332
Cited by
Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death
Corley, D. A., Jensen, C. D., Marks, A. R., Zhao, W. K., Lee, J. K., Doubeni, C. A., Zauber, A. G., de Boer, J., Fireman, B. H., Schottinger, J. E., et al. (2014) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1309086 · Cited by 2,270
Lieberman, D. A., Rex, D. K., Winawer, S. J., Giardiello, F. M., Johnson, D. A., & Levin, T. R. (2012) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2012.06.001 · Cited by 1,892
ACG Clinical Guidelines: Colorectal Cancer Screening 2021
Shaukat, A., Kahi, C. J., Burke, C. A., Rabeneck, L., Sauer, B. G., & Rex, D. K. (2021) · American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.14309/ajg.0000000000001122 · Cited by 853
Smith, R. A., Andrews, K. S., Brooks, D., Fedewa, S. A., Manassaram‐Baptiste, D., Saslow, D., Brawley, O. W., & Wender, R. C. (2017) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.21392 · Cited by 719
Zhao, S., Wang, S., Pan, P., Xia, T., Chang, X., Yang, X., Guo, L., Meng, Q., Yang, F., Qian, W., et al. (2019) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2019.01.260 · Cited by 660
Metadata
- Authors
- Singh, H., Nugent, Z., Demers, A. A., & Bernstein, C. N.
- Venue
- American Journal of Gastroenterology
- Published
- 2010-12
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2588-2596
- ISSN
- 0002-9270 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2066639061
- Cited by
- 261
- References
- 25
- FWCI
- 9.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rate and Predictors of Early/Missed Colorectal Cancers After Colonoscopy in Manitoba: A Population-Based Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/ajg.2010.390
- The paper
- Singh, H., Nugent, Z., Demers, A. A., & Bernstein, C. N. (2010). Rate and Predictors of Early/Missed Colorectal Cancers After Colonoscopy in Manitoba: A Population-Based Study. American Journal of Gastroenterology. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2010.390
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
