Adenoma detection rate is not influenced by the timing of colonoscopy when performed in half-day blocks
Abstract
Objectives Afternoon colonoscopies have recently been reported to be associated with lower adenoma detection rate (ADR), which was attributed to physician fatigue resulting from the same endoscopist performing procedures throughout the day. The aim of our study was to assess ADR in morning compared with afternoon colonoscopy performed in half-day blocks with different physicians. We evaluated the primary hypothesis that morning and afternoon ADRs would not differ significantly when performed in half-day blocks by different endoscopists. Methods Data on all colonoscopies performed between January 2009 and December 2009 were obtained from our endoscopy database. All patients who underwent colonoscopies in 2009 for screening, surveillance, and family history of colon cancer/polyps were included in the study. Morning colonoscopies were defined as those that were performed from 0800 to 1200 hours. Afternoon colonoscopies were defined as those that were performed from 1300 to 1700 hours. Colonoscopies in each block were performed either by different endoscopists working in half-day (morning or afternoon) block schedules or by the same endoscopist working a full-day schedule. Results A total of 4,665 patients were included in the study. For endoscopists working the full-day, the afternoon ADR was significantly lower than the morning ADR (21 vs. 26.1%; odds ratio (OR)=0.75; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.59, 0.96; P=0.02). Conversely, in the half-day group, there was no significant d…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The number of endoscopies performed in a day by an endoscopist negatively impacts performance.
“It was found that the number of endoscopies performed in a day by an endoscopist negatively impacted performance [86][87][88] , but the use of CADe eliminates this adverse effect [85] .”
From Enhancing human-AI collaboration: The case of colonoscopy (2024) · cites this paper as [86]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Enhancing human-AI collaboration: The case of colonoscopy
Introzzi, L., Zonca, J., Cabitza, F., Cherubini, P., & Reverberi, C. (2024) · Digestive and Liver Disease · doi:10.1016/j.dld.2023.10.018 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
- Authors
- Gurudu, S. R., Ratuapli, S. K., Leighton, J. A., Heigh, R. I., & Crowell, M. D.
- Affiliations
- Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US)
- Corresponding author
- Gurudu, Suryakanth R
- Venue
- American Journal of Gastroenterology
- Published
- 2011-08
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1466-1471
- ISSN
- 0002-9270 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2091892689
- Cited by
- 57
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 2.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The American Journal of Gastroenterology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
- Keywords
- adenoma detection rate, colonoscopy timing, physician fatigue, colorectal cancer screening, colorectal cancer surveillance
- MeSH terms
- Adenoma, Adult, Aged, Appointments and Schedules, Colonic Neoplasms, Colonic Polyps, Colonoscopy, Fatigue, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychomotor Performance, Time Factors, Multivariate Analysis, Logistic Models, Workload
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review