Cited by 57Colorectal Cancer Screening and DetectionGenetic factors in colorectal cancerColorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments

Adenoma detection rate is not influenced by the timing of colonoscopy when performed in half-day blocks

Gurudu, Suryakanth R, Ratuapli, Shiva K, Leighton, Jonathan A, Heigh, Russell I, Crowell, Michael D·2011·American Journal of Gastroenterology

Abstract

Objectives Afternoon colonoscopies have recently been reported to be associated with lower adenoma detection rate (ADR), which was attributed to physician fatigue resulting from the same endoscopist performing procedures throughout the day. The aim of our study was to assess ADR in morning compared with afternoon colonoscopy performed in half-day blocks with different physicians. We evaluated the primary hypothesis that morning and afternoon ADRs would not differ significantly when performed in half-day blocks by different endoscopists. Methods Data on all colonoscopies performed between January 2009 and December 2009 were obtained from our endoscopy database. All patients who underwent colonoscopies in 2009 for screening, surveillance, and family history of colon cancer/polyps were included in the study. Morning colonoscopies were defined as those that were performed from 0800 to 1200 hours. Afternoon colonoscopies were defined as those that were performed from 1300 to 1700 hours. Colonoscopies in each block were performed either by different endoscopists working in half-day (morning or afternoon) block schedules or by the same endoscopist working a full-day schedule. Results A total of 4,665 patients were included in the study. For endoscopists working the full-day, the afternoon ADR was significantly lower than the morning ADR (21 vs. 26.1%; odds ratio (OR)=0.75; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.59, 0.96; P=0.02). Conversely, in the half-day group, there was no significant d…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ajg.2011.125

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The number of endoscopies performed in a day by an endoscopist negatively impacts performance.

    “It was found that the number of endoscopies performed in a day by an endoscopist negatively impacted performance [86][87][88] , but the use of CADe eliminates this adverse effect [85] .”

    From Enhancing human-AI collaboration: The case of colonoscopy (2024) · cites this paper as [86]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gurudu, S. R., Ratuapli, S. K., Leighton, J. A., Heigh, R. I., & Crowell, M. D.
Affiliations
Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US)
Corresponding author
Gurudu, Suryakanth R
Venue
American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2011-08
Volume
106
Issue
8
Pages
1466-1471
ISSN
0002-9270 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2091892689
Cited by
57
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
FWCI
2.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Journal of Gastroenterology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
Keywords
adenoma detection rate, colonoscopy timing, physician fatigue, colorectal cancer screening, colorectal cancer surveillance
MeSH terms
Adenoma, Adult, Aged, Appointments and Schedules, Colonic Neoplasms, Colonic Polyps, Colonoscopy, Fatigue, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychomotor Performance, Time Factors, Multivariate Analysis, Logistic Models, Workload

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review