Cited by 99Gastrointestinal motility and disordersPelvic floor disorders treatmentsInfant Health and Development

IBS Patients Show Frequent Fluctuations Between Loose/Watery and Hard/Lumpy Stools: Implications for Treatment

Open access
Palsson, Olafur S, Baggish, Jeffrey S, Turner, Marsha J, Whitehead, William E·2012·American Journal of Gastroenterology

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to determine how variable stool consistency is in patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and to assess the relationship between stool consistency and gastrointestinal symptoms. METHODS: Individuals with a physician diagnosis of IBS were recruited by advertisement. Enrollment questionnaires included the Rome III Diagnostic Questionnaire and IBS Symptom Severity Scale. Then, 185 patients meeting the Rome criteria for IBS rated the consistency (using the Bristol Stool Scale) of each bowel movement (BM) for 90 days and whether the BM was accompanied by pain, urgency, or soiling. Each night, they transferred BM ratings from a paper diary to an internet form and also reported the average daily intensity of abdominal pain, bloating, bowel habit dissatisfaction, and life interference of bowel symptoms. Only the longest sequence of consecutive days of diary data was used in the analysis (average of 73 days). RESULTS: Patients were 89% females with average age 36.6 years. Among the patients, 78% had both loose/watery and hard/lumpy stools; the average was three fluctuations between these extremes per month. The proportion of loose/watery stools correlated r=0.78 between the first and second months and the proportion of hard/lumpy stools correlated r=0.85 between months. Loose/watery stools were associated with more BM-related pain, urgency, and soiling than hard/lumpy or normal stools; however, IBS-C patients had significantly more BM-unrelated abdominal pain, bloating, dissatisfaction with bowel habits, and life interference than IBS-D patients. Questionnaires overestimated the frequency of abnormal stool consistency and gastrointestinal symptoms compared with diaries. CONCLUSIONS: Stool consistency varies greatly within individuals. However, stool patterns are stable within an individual from month to month. The paradoxical findings of greater symptom severity after individual loose/watery BMs vs. greater overall symptom severity in IBS-C implies different physiological mechanisms for symptoms in constipation compared with diarrhea. Daily symptom monitoring is more sensitive and reliable than a questionnaire.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ajg.2011.358

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Although IBS is subgrouped according to predominant stool pattern, this fluctuates in many patients.

    “Although IBS is subgrouped according to predominant stool pattern, 5 this fluctuates in many patients. 64”

    From Irritable bowel syndrome (2020) · cites this paper as [64]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 23 · Cited by 99

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. [2]Drossman DA Chey WD Johanson JF Fass R Scott C Panas R Ueno R Clinical trial: lubiprostone in patients with constipation-associated irritable bowel syndrome--results of two randomized, placebo-controlled studies Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2009 29 329 341 19006537
  2. [3]Johnston JM Kurtz CB MacDougall JE Lavins BJ Currie MG Fitch DA O'Dea C Baird M Lembo AJ Linaclotide improves abdominal pain and bowel habits in a phase IIb study of patients with irritable bowel syndrome with constipation Gastroenterol 2010 139 1877 1886 20801122
  3. [4]Muller-Lissner SA Fumagalli I Bardhan KD Pace F Pecher E Nault B Ruegg P Tegaserod, a 5-HT(4) receptor partial agonist, relieves symptoms in irritable bowel syndrome patients with abdominal pain, bloating and constipation Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2001 15 1655 1666 11564007
  4. [5]Camilleri M Northcutt AR Kong S Dukes GE McSorley D Mangel AW Efficacy and safety of alosetron in women with irritable bowel syndrome: a randomised, placebo-controlled trial Lancet 2000 355 1035 1040 10744088
  5. [6]Garrigues V Mearin F Badia X Balboa A Benavent J Caballero A Dominguez E Diaz-Rubio M Roset M Figueras M Cucala M Change over time of bowel habit in irritable bowel syndrome: a prospective, observational, 1-year follow-up study (RITMO study) Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2007 25 323 332 17217445
  6. [7]Drossman DA Morris CB Hu Y Toner BB Diamant N Leserman J Shetzline M Dalton C Bangdiwala SI A prospective assessment of bowel habit in irritable bowel syndrome in women: defining an alternator Gastroenterol 2005 128 580 589 15765393
  7. [8]Dorn SD Morris CB Hu Y Toner BB Diamant N Whitehead WE Bangdiwala SI Drossman DA Irritable bowel syndrome subtypes defined by Rome II and Rome III criteria are similar J Clin Gastroenterol 2009 43 214 220 19623100
  8. [9]Hellstrom PM Saito YA Bytzer P Tack J Mueller-Lissner S Chang L Characteristics of Acute Pain Attacks in Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome Meeting Rome III Criteria Am J Gastroenterol 2011 21448146
  9. [10]Ragnarsson G Bodemar G Pain is temporally related to eating but not to defaecation in the irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Patients' description of diarrhea, constipation and symptom variation during a prospective 6-week study Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1998 10 415 421 9619389
  10. [11]Chang L Lee OY Naliboff B Schmulson M Mayer EA Sensation of bloating and visible abdominal distension in patients with irritable bowel syndrome Am J Gastroenterol 2001 96 3341 3347 11774947
  11. [12]Houghton LA Lea R Agrawal A Reilly B Whorwell PJ Relationship of abdominal bloating to distention in irritable bowel syndrome and effect of bowel habit Gastroenterol 2006 131 1003 1010 17030170
  12. [13]Bharucha AE Seide BM Zinsmeister AR Melton LJ III Insights into normal and disordered bowel habits from bowel diaries Am J Gastroenterol 2008 103 692 698 18021288 PMC2557101
  13. [16]Drossman DA Patrick DL Whitehead WE Toner BB Diamant NE Hu Y Jia H Bangdiwala SI Further validation of the IBS-QOL: a disease-specific quality-of-life questionnaire Am J Gastroenterol 2000 95 999 1007 10763950
  14. [18]Derogatis LR BSI 18 Brief Symptom Inventory 18: Administration, scoring, and procedures manual NCS Pearson,Inc 2000
  15. [20]Pimentel M Hwang L Melmed GY Low K Vasiliauskas E Ippoliti A Yang J Lezcano S Conklin JL Sahakian A New clinical method for distinguishing D-IBS from other gastrointestinal conditions causing diarrhea: the LA/IBS diagnostic strategy Dig Dis Sci 2010 55 145 149 19169820
  16. [23]Walter SA Kjellstrom L Talley NJ Andreasson AN Nyhlin H Agreus L Prospective diary evaluation of unexplained abdominal pain and bowel dysfunction: a population-based colonoscopy study Dig Dis Sci 2011 56 1444 1451 21063776
  17. [24]Walter SA Kjellstrom L Nyhlin H Talley NJ Agreus L Assessment of normal bowel habits in the general adult population: the Popcol study Scand J Gastroenterol 2010 45 556 566 20205503
  18. [25]Whitehead WE Levy RL Von KM Feld AD Palsson OS Turner M Drossman DA The usual medical care for irritable bowel syndrome Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2004 20 1305 1315 15606392

Authors
Palsson, O. S., Baggish, J. S., Turner, M. J., & Whitehead, W. E.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Palsson, Olafur S
Venue
American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2012-02
Volume
107
Issue
2
Pages
286-295
ISSN
0002-9270 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2045340347
Cited by
99
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 6
FWCI
7.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The American Journal of Gastroenterology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK031369, R01 DK31369)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Infant Health and Development
Keywords
irritable bowel syndrome, stool consistency, Bristol stool scale, irritable bowel syndrome with constipation, diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome, bowel urgency, soiling, abdominal pain, bloating, symptom severity, symptom monitoring, daily symptom diary
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Constipation, Defecation, Diarrhea, Feces, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Abdominal Pain, Irritable Bowel Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review