Cited by 66Colorectal Cancer Screening and DetectionHospital Admissions and OutcomesHealthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization

Queue position in the endoscopic schedule impacts effectiveness of colonoscopy

Open access
Lee, Alexander, Iskander, John M, Gupta, Nitin, Borg, Brian B, Zuckerman, Gary, Banerjee, Bhaskar, Gyawali, Prakash C·2011·American Journal of Gastroenterology

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Endoscopist fatigue potentially impacts colonoscopy. Fatigue is difficult to quantitate, but polyp detection rates between non-fatigued and fatigued time periods could represent a surrogate marker. We assessed whether timing variables impacted polyp detection rates at a busy tertiary care endoscopy suite. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing colonoscopy were retrospectively identified. Indications, clinical demographics, pre-procedural, and procedural variables were extracted from chart review; colonoscopy findings were determined from the procedure reports. Three separate timing variables were assessed as surrogate markers for endoscopist fatigue: morning vs. afternoon procedures, start times throughout the day, and queue position, a unique variable that takes into account the number of procedures performed before the colonoscopy of interest. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine whether timing variables and other clinical, pre-procedural, and procedural variables predicted polyp detection. RESULTS: During the 4-month study period, 1,083 outpatient colonoscopy procedures (57.5±0.5 years, 59.5% female) were identified, performed by 28 endoscopists (mean 38.7 procedures/endoscopist), with a mean polyp detection rate of 0.851/colonoscopy. At least, one adenoma was detected in 297 procedures (27.4%). A 12.4% reduction in mean detected polyps was detected between morning and afternoon procedures (0.90±0.06 vs. 0.76±0.06, P=0.15). Using start time on a continuous scale, however, each elapsed hour in the day was associated with a 4.6% reduction in polyp detection (P=0.005). When queue position was assessed, a 5.4% reduction in polyp detection was noted with each increase in queue position (P=0.016). These results remained significant when controlled for each individual endoscopist. CONCLUSIONS: Polyp detection rates decline as time passes during an endoscopist's schedule, potentially from endoscopist fatigue. Queue position may be a novel surrogate measure for operator fatigue.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ajg.2011.87

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The number of endoscopies performed in a day by an endoscopist negatively impacts performance.

    “It was found that the number of endoscopies performed in a day by an endoscopist negatively impacted performance [86][87][88] , but the use of CADe eliminates this adverse effect [85] .”

    From Enhancing human-AI collaboration: The case of colonoscopy (2024) · cites this paper as [87]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. [1]Rex DK Sledge G Harper P Colonic neoplasia in asymptomatic persons with negative fecal occult blood tests: influence of age, gender, and family history Am J Gastroenterol 1993 88 825 31 8503374
  2. [2]Lynch KL Ahnen DJ Byers T First-degree relatives of patients with advanced colorectal adenomas have an increased prevalence of colorectal cancer Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2003 1 96 102 15017501
  3. [3]Lieberman DA Weiss DG Bond JH Use of colonoscopy to screen asymptomatic adults for colorectal cancer Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group 380 N Engl J Med 2000 343 162 8 10900274
  4. [4]Rex DK Bond JH Winawer S Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer Am J Gastroenterol 2002 97 1296 308 12094842
  5. [5]Harewood GC Sharma VK de Garmo P Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia Gastrointest Endosc 2003 58 76 9 12838225
  6. [6]Froehlich F Wietlisbach V Gonvers JJ Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study Gastrointest Endosc 2005 61 378 84 15758907
  7. [7]Harris JK Froehlich F Wietlisbach V Factors associated with the technical performance of colonoscopy: an EGAPE Study Dig Liver Dis 2007 39 678 89 17434349
  8. [8]Borg BB Gupta NK Zuckerman GR Impact of obesity on bowel preparation for colonoscopy Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009 7 670 5 19245852 PMC4151157
  9. [9]Rex DK Colonoscopic withdrawal technique is associated with adenoma miss rates Gastrointest Endosc 2000 51 33 6 10625792
  10. [10]Van Rijn JC Reitsma JB Stoker J Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review Am J Gastroenterol 2006 101 343 50 16454841
  11. [11]Chan MY Cohen H Spiegel BMR Fewer polyps detected by colonoscopy as the day progresses at a Veteran’s Administration teaching hospital 2009 7 1217 23 19631284
  12. [12]Sanaka MR Deepinder F Thota PN Adenomas are detected more often in morning than in afternoon colonoscopy Am J Gastroenterol 2009 104 1659 64 19491841
  13. [13]Howard SK Rosekind MR Katz JD Fatigue in anesthesia: implications and strategies for patient and provider safety Anesthesiology 2002 97 1281 94 12411816
  14. [14]Taffinder NJ McManus IC Gul Y Effect of sleep deprivation on surgeons’ dexterity on laparoscopic simulator Lancet 1998 352 1191 9777838
  15. [15]Eastridge BJ Hamilton EC O’Keefe GE Effect of sleep deprivation on the performance of simulated laparoscopic surgical skill Am J Surg 2003 186 169 74 12885613
  16. [16]Philip P Taillard J Moore N The effects of coffee and napping on nighttime highway driving: a randomized trial Ann Intern Med 2006 144 785 91 16754920
  17. [18]Munson GW Harewood GC Francis DL Time of day variation in polyp detection rate for colonoscopies performed on a 3-h shift schedule Gastrointest Endosc 2010 73 467 75 20933230
  18. [19]Harewood GC Chrysostomou K Himy N Impact of operator fatigue on endoscopy performance: implications for procedure scheduling Dig Dis Sci 2009 54 1656 61 19034661
  19. [20]Barclay RL Vicari JJ Doughty AS Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy N Engl J Med 2006 355 2533 41 17167136
  20. [21]Lieberman DA Prindiville S Weiss DG Risk factors for advanced colonic neoplasia and hyperplastic polyps in asymptomatic individuals JAMA 2003 290 2959 67 14665657
  21. [22]Hendry PO Jenkins JT Diament RH The impact of poor bowel preparation on colonoscopy: a prospective single centre study of preparation on colonoscopy Colorectal Dis 2007 9 745 8 17477852
  22. [23]Kazarian ES Carreira FS Toribara NW Colonoscopy completion in a large safety net health care system Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008 6 438 42 18304886

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, A., Iskander, J. M., Gupta, N., Borg, B. B., Zuckerman, G., Banerjee, B., & Gyawali, P. C.
Affiliations
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Venue
American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2011-08
Volume
106
Issue
8
Pages
1457-1465
ISSN
0002-9270 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2020023008
Cited by
66
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 8
FWCI
2.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The American Journal of Gastroenterology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5t32dk007301-35)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (T32-DK007301, 5-T32-DK07301-35, T32DK007130)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization
Keywords
colonoscopy, polyp detection rate, adenoma detection
MeSH terms
Adenoma, Adult, Aged, Analysis of Variance, Appointments and Schedules, Colonic Neoplasms, Colonic Polyps, Colonoscopy, Fatigue, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Outpatients, Psychomotor Performance, Time Factors, Workload

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review