Linaclotide for Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Constipation: A 26-Week, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety
Abstract
Objectives Linaclotide is a minimally absorbed peptide guanylate cyclase-C agonist. The objective of this trial was to determine the efficacy and safety of linaclotide treatment in patients with irritable bowel syndrome with constipation (IBS-C) over 26 weeks. Methods This phase 3, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial randomized IBS-C patients to placebo or 290 μg of oral linaclotide once daily for a 26-week treatment period. The primary and the secondary efficacy assessments were evaluated over the first 12 weeks of treatment. Primary end points included the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) end point for IBS-C (responder: a patient who reported (i) improvement of ≥ 30 % from baseline in average daily worst abdominal pain score and (ii) increase of ≥ 1 complete spontaneous bowel movement (CSBM) from baseline, both in the same week for ≥ 6 / 12 weeks) and three other primary end points, based on improvements in abdominal pain and CSBMs for 9/12 weeks. Adverse events (AEs) were monitored. Results In all, 804 patients (mean age = 44 years, female = 90 % , white = 78 % ) were evaluated; 33.7 % of linaclotide-treated patients were FDA end point responders, vs. 13.9 % of placebo-treated patients ( P Conclusions Linaclotide 290 μg once daily significantly improved abdominal and bowel symptoms associated with IBS-C over 26 weeks of treatment.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Placebo-controlled trials have demonstrated efficacy of intestinal secretagogues (lubiprostone, linaclotide, plecanatide, tenapanor) in IBS-C.
“Placebo-controlled trials have demonstrated efficacy of these drugs in IBS-C”
From Irritable bowel syndrome (2020) · cites this paper as [115]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 21 · Cited by 463
- Authors
- Chey, W. D., Lembo, A. J., Lavins, B. J., Shiff, S. J., Kurtz, C. B., Currie, M. G., MacDougall, J. E., Jia, X. D., Shao, J. Z., Fitch, D. A., Baird, M. J., Schneier, H. A., & Johnston, J. M.
- Affiliations
- Michigan Medicine (US)
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
- Ironwood Pharmaceuticals (United States) (US)
- Forest Laboratories (United States) (US)
- Corresponding author
- Johnston, Jeffrey M
- Venue
- American Journal of Gastroenterology
- Published
- 2012-11
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1702-1712
- ISSN
- 0002-9270 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1987172422
- Cited by
- 463
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2026: 24 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 47 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 43 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 40.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The American Journal of Gastroenterology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Inflammatory Bowel Disease
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Microscopic Colitis
- Keywords
- linaclotide, irritable bowel syndrome with constipation, guanylate cyclase-C agonist, abdominal pain, bloating, spontaneous bowel movements, treatment efficacy, drug safety, adverse events, number needed to treat, number needed to harm
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Analysis of Variance, Constipation, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Peptides, Placebos, Treatment Outcome, Endpoint Determination, Irritable Bowel Syndrome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review